vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Jabil (JBL) and Mastercard (MA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Mastercard is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.8B vs $8.3B, roughly 1.1× Jabil). Mastercard runs the higher net margin — 46.1% vs 1.8%, a 44.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Jabil posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 17.6%). Mastercard produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.9B vs $228.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Mastercard's revenue compounded faster (17.8% CAGR vs 10.8%).

Jabil Inc. is an American multinational manufacturing company involved in the design, engineering, and manufacturing of electronic circuit board assemblies and systems, along with supply chain services, primarily serving original equipment manufacturers. It is headquartered in the Gateway area of St. Petersburg, Florida. It is one of the largest companies in the Tampa Bay area.

Mastercard Inc. is an American multinational payment card services corporation headquartered in Purchase, New York. It offers a range of payment transaction processing and other related-payment services. Throughout the world, its principal business is to process payments between the banks of merchants and the card-issuing banks or credit unions of the purchasers who use the Mastercard-brand debit, credit and prepaid cards to make purchases. Mastercard has been publicly traded since 2006.

JBL vs MA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MA
MA
1.1× larger
MA
$8.8B
$8.3B
JBL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
JBL
JBL
+1.2% gap
JBL
18.7%
17.6%
MA
Higher net margin
MA
MA
44.3% more per $
MA
46.1%
1.8%
JBL
More free cash flow
MA
MA
$4.7B more FCF
MA
$4.9B
$228.0M
JBL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MA
MA
Annualised
MA
17.8%
10.8%
JBL

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Revenue
$8.3B
$8.8B
Net Profit
$146.0M
$4.1B
Gross Margin
8.9%
Operating Margin
3.4%
55.8%
Net Margin
1.8%
46.1%
Revenue YoY
18.7%
17.6%
Net Profit YoY
46.0%
21.5%
EPS (diluted)
$1.35
$4.52

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$8.3B
$8.8B
Q3 25
$8.3B
$8.6B
Q2 25
$7.8B
$8.1B
Q1 25
$6.7B
$7.3B
Q4 24
$7.0B
$7.5B
Q3 24
$7.0B
$7.4B
Q2 24
$6.8B
$7.0B
Q1 24
$6.8B
$6.3B
Net Profit
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$146.0M
$4.1B
Q3 25
$218.0M
$3.9B
Q2 25
$222.0M
$3.7B
Q1 25
$117.0M
$3.3B
Q4 24
$100.0M
$3.3B
Q3 24
$138.0M
$3.3B
Q2 24
$129.0M
$3.3B
Q1 24
$927.0M
$3.0B
Gross Margin
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
8.9%
Q3 25
9.5%
Q2 25
8.7%
Q1 25
8.6%
Q4 24
8.7%
Q3 24
9.5%
Q2 24
9.0%
Q1 24
9.3%
Operating Margin
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
3.4%
55.8%
Q3 25
4.1%
58.8%
Q2 25
5.1%
58.7%
Q1 25
3.6%
57.2%
Q4 24
2.8%
52.6%
Q3 24
4.6%
54.3%
Q2 24
3.9%
58.0%
Q1 24
16.7%
56.8%
Net Margin
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
1.8%
46.1%
Q3 25
2.6%
45.7%
Q2 25
2.8%
45.5%
Q1 25
1.7%
45.2%
Q4 24
1.4%
44.6%
Q3 24
2.0%
44.3%
Q2 24
1.9%
46.8%
Q1 24
13.7%
47.4%
EPS (diluted)
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$1.35
$4.52
Q3 25
$1.95
$4.34
Q2 25
$2.03
$4.07
Q1 25
$1.06
$3.59
Q4 24
$0.88
$3.64
Q3 24
$1.33
$3.53
Q2 24
$1.06
$3.50
Q1 24
$7.31
$3.22

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.6B
$10.6B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.9B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
$7.7B
Total Assets
$19.3B
$54.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.15×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$1.6B
$10.6B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$10.3B
Q2 25
$1.5B
$9.0B
Q1 25
$1.6B
$7.6B
Q4 24
$2.1B
$8.4B
Q3 24
$2.2B
$11.1B
Q2 24
$2.5B
$7.0B
Q1 24
$2.6B
$7.3B
Total Debt
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$2.9B
Q3 25
$2.9B
Q2 25
$2.9B
Q1 25
$2.9B
Q4 24
$2.9B
Q3 24
$2.9B
Q2 24
$2.9B
Q1 24
$2.9B
Stockholders' Equity
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$1.3B
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$7.9B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$7.9B
Q1 25
$1.4B
$6.7B
Q4 24
$1.6B
$6.5B
Q3 24
$1.7B
$7.4B
Q2 24
$2.3B
$7.4B
Q1 24
$2.7B
$7.2B
Total Assets
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$19.3B
$54.2B
Q3 25
$18.5B
$53.3B
Q2 25
$18.6B
$51.4B
Q1 25
$17.4B
$48.5B
Q4 24
$17.8B
$48.1B
Q3 24
$17.4B
$47.2B
Q2 24
$17.4B
$42.3B
Q1 24
$17.1B
$42.6B
Debt / Equity
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
2.15×
Q3 25
1.91×
Q2 25
2.24×
Q1 25
2.12×
Q4 24
1.81×
Q3 24
1.66×
Q2 24
1.26×
Q1 24
1.08×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$323.0M
$5.0B
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$228.0M
$4.9B
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
2.7%
55.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
1.1%
1.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
2.21×
1.23×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$1.2B
$17.2B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$323.0M
$5.0B
Q3 25
$588.0M
$5.7B
Q2 25
$406.0M
$4.6B
Q1 25
$334.0M
$2.4B
Q4 24
$312.0M
$4.8B
Q3 24
$535.0M
$5.1B
Q2 24
$515.0M
$3.1B
Q1 24
$218.0M
$1.7B
Free Cash Flow
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
$228.0M
$4.9B
Q3 25
$419.0M
$5.5B
Q2 25
$320.0M
$4.6B
Q1 25
$218.0M
$2.2B
Q4 24
$215.0M
$4.7B
Q3 24
$411.0M
$5.0B
Q2 24
$409.0M
$3.0B
Q1 24
$-48.0M
$1.5B
FCF Margin
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
2.7%
55.5%
Q3 25
5.1%
63.8%
Q2 25
4.1%
56.1%
Q1 25
3.2%
30.6%
Q4 24
3.1%
63.3%
Q3 24
5.9%
68.2%
Q2 24
6.0%
43.4%
Q1 24
-0.7%
23.9%
Capex Intensity
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
1.1%
1.3%
Q3 25
2.0%
2.1%
Q2 25
1.1%
0.5%
Q1 25
1.7%
2.2%
Q4 24
1.4%
1.3%
Q3 24
1.8%
1.5%
Q2 24
1.6%
1.7%
Q1 24
3.9%
2.5%
Cash Conversion
JBL
JBL
MA
MA
Q4 25
2.21×
1.23×
Q3 25
2.70×
1.44×
Q2 25
1.83×
1.24×
Q1 25
2.85×
0.73×
Q4 24
3.12×
1.45×
Q3 24
3.88×
1.57×
Q2 24
3.99×
0.96×
Q1 24
0.24×
0.56×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

JBL
JBL

Intelligent Infrastructure$4.0B49%
Transferred Over Time$2.9B35%
Connected Living And Digital Commerce$1.2B15%
Transferred At Point In Time$127.0M2%

MA
MA

Payment Network$4.9B56%
Value Added Services And Solutions$3.9B44%

Related Comparisons