vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd (JF) and RenovoRx, Inc. (RNXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($295.2K vs $238.0K, roughly 1.2× RenovoRx, Inc.). Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -31.0% vs -1235.7%, a 1204.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd is a fintech SaaS provider offering end-to-end digital financial solutions. Its core services include intelligent risk management, digital lending facilitation, and wealth management tools, serving banks, consumer finance firms and e-commerce platforms primarily in the Chinese market.
RenovoRx, Inc. is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing innovative targeted therapy delivery systems for cancer treatment. Its core assets include proprietary transarterial delivery platforms, with primary operations in the United States, serving unmet medical needs in the oncology care segment.
JF vs RNXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $295.2K | $238.0K |
| Net Profit | $-91.6K | $-2.9M |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 88.2% |
| Operating Margin | -47.2% | -1479.8% |
| Net Margin | -31.0% | -1235.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -2.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.00 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $238.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $266.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $295.2K | $422.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $197.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $289.0K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $1.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-91.6K | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-161.6K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 80.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 60.9% | 64.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.6% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -1479.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1203.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -47.2% | -634.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1578.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -51.1% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | -300500.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1235.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1094.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.0% | -686.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1228.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -55.9% | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | -300300.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $653.0K | $7.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $5.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.9M | $8.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $653.0K | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $863.7K | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $13.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $12.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2M | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $13.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-3.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | $-2.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1717.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
