vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Mobile Ltd (JG) and Valneva SE (VALN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Valneva SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($36.2M vs $25.0M, roughly 1.4× Aurora Mobile Ltd). Aurora Mobile Ltd runs the higher net margin — -1.4% vs -54.1%, a 52.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
Valneva SE is a specialty vaccine company registered in Saint-Herblain, France, developing, producing and commercializing vaccines for infectious diseases. It has manufacturing sites in Livingston, Scotland; Solna, Sweden, and Vienna, Austria; with other offices in France, Canada and the United States.
JG vs VALN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.0M | $36.2M |
| Net Profit | $-360.0K | $-19.6M |
| Gross Margin | 66.3% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.4% | -49.5% |
| Net Margin | -1.4% | -54.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $36.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $93.2M |
| Q2 25 | $-360.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-965.0K | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-19.6M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 66.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.1% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 38.9% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -49.5% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | -161.3% |
| Q2 25 | -1.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -54.1% | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $16.7M | $274.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0M | $221.2M |
| Total Assets | $53.2M | $637.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $363.1M |
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $221.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $100.7M |
| Q2 25 | $53.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $637.2M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | $783.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $795.0K | $-26.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $772.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $795.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | $-26.3M | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | $772.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $553.0K | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
