vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC (JHG) and LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. (LOGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.2× JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC). JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC runs the higher net margin — 35.3% vs 17.7%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.3% vs 6.1%). LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($465.6M vs $320.4M). Over the past eight quarters, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC's revenue compounded faster (43.9% CAGR vs 18.5%).
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss multinational manufacturer of computer peripherals and software. Headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, the company has offices throughout Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. It is a component of the Swiss Market Index, and is listed on the Nasdaq.
JHG vs LOGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $403.2M | $251.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 42.7% | 20.1% |
| Net Margin | 35.3% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 61.3% | 6.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.0% | 25.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.59 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $700.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $633.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $708.3M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $624.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.7M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $403.2M | $251.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.1M | $170.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.9M | $146.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $144.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.8M | $200.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $145.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.7M | $141.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $167.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.2% |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | 12.9% |
| Q4 25 | 35.3% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.6% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.59 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.95 | $0.98 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.81 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $8.3B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | $3.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $322.7M | $480.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $320.4M | $465.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.0% | 32.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.80× | 1.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $710.9M | $903.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $322.7M | $480.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.8M | $228.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.2M | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.3M | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.5M | $166.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.8M | $176.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | $239.1M |
| Q4 25 | $320.4M | $465.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.4M | $212.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.2M | $108.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0K | $116.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.5M | $356.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.9M | $151.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.9M | $161.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | $228.8M |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.4% | 26.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.7% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | 1.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.82× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.02× | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.03× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.37× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.04× | 1.43× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JHG
| Investment Advice | $585.2M | 51% |
| Investment Performance | $425.8M | 37% |
| Other | $76.4M | 7% |
LOGI
| Retail Gaming | $482.7M | 34% |
| Retail Keyboards Desktops | $254.6M | 18% |
| Retail Pointing Devices | $241.2M | 17% |
| Retail Video Collaboration | $193.3M | 14% |
| Retail Tablet And Other Accessories | $93.6M | 7% |
| Retail Webcams | $82.3M | 6% |
| Retail Headsets | $45.9M | 3% |
| Other Retail Products | $28.0M | 2% |
