vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC (JHG) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Lyft, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.3× JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC). Lyft, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 183.9% vs 35.3%, a 148.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.3% vs 3.6%). Over the past eight quarters, JANUS HENDERSON GROUP PLC's revenue compounded faster (43.9% CAGR vs 11.3%).
Janus Henderson is a British-American global asset management group headquartered in the City of London, United Kingdom. It offers a range of financial products to individuals, intermediary advisors, and institutional investors globally under the trade name Janus Henderson Investors.
Lyft, Inc. is an American company offering ride-hailing services, motorized scooters, and bicycle-sharing systems in the United States and Canada, and, via its Free Now mobile app, Europe. Lyft is the second-largest ridesharing company in the United States after Uber. It has 25 million active riders and coordinates 9 million rides per day.
JHG vs LYFT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $403.2M | $2.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.1% |
| Operating Margin | 42.7% | -12.4% |
| Net Margin | 35.3% | 183.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 61.3% | 3.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.0% | 4363.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.59 | $6.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $700.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $633.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $621.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $708.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $624.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $588.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $551.7M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $403.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $142.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.9M | $40.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $120.7M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.8M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.3M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.7M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $130.1M | $-31.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.6% |
| Q4 25 | 42.7% | -12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.7% | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.4% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.6% | -5.2% |
| Q4 25 | 35.3% | 183.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.2% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.6% | -2.6% |
| Q4 25 | $2.59 | $6.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.92 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.95 | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.77 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.77 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.81 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.81 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $1.8B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.1B | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $8.3B | $9.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $573.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $979.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $995.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $971.5M |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $573.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8B | $732.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.7B | $838.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $767.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $655.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $577.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $491.3M |
| Q4 25 | $8.3B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3B | $4.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.78× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.98× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $322.7M | $246.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $320.4M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.80× | 0.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $710.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $322.7M | $246.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.8M | $291.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $135.2M | $343.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8M | $287.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $247.3M | $153.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.5M | $264.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $223.8M | $276.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.0M | $156.2M |
| Q4 25 | $320.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $256.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $900.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $243.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $225.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $221.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 28.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.80× | 0.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.82× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | 8.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.02× | 111.89× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.03× | 2.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.37× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 55.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.04× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JHG
| Investment Advice | $585.2M | 51% |
| Investment Performance | $425.8M | 37% |
| Other | $76.4M | 7% |
LYFT
Segment breakdown not available.
