vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Jack Henry & Associates (JKHY) and MATTEL INC (MAT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MATTEL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($862.2M vs $619.3M, roughly 1.4× Jack Henry & Associates). Jack Henry & Associates runs the higher net margin — 20.1% vs 7.1%, a 13.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Jack Henry & Associates posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 4.3%). Jack Henry & Associates produced more free cash flow last quarter ($131.4M vs $-88.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Jack Henry & Associates's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -10.6%).
Jack Henry and Associates, also known as Jack Henry is an American company founded in 1976 and devoted to financial technology and payment processing services, mostly for community banks and credit unions. They assist regional banks and credit unions to control risk, make regulatory filings and add or improve their online banking services. Jack Henry stock trades on the NASDAQ exchange under the symbol JKHY, and is also part of the S&P 400 for mid-size American companies.
Mattel Films was the film production division of American toy and entertainment company Mattel that operated from September 6, 2018 to June 2, 2025. It succeeded Mattel Playground Productions, which was formed on October 16, 2013 as part of Mattel Global Brands, a unified media structural and strategy unit, as itself the successor to Mattel Entertainment and Mattel Studios, Mattel's prior entertainment brands/banners.
JKHY vs MAT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $619.3M | $862.2M |
| Net Profit | $124.7M | $61.0M |
| Gross Margin | 43.3% | 44.9% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 20.1% | 7.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 27.4% | 251.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.72 | $0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $862.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $619.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $644.7M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $585.1M | $826.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $573.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $601.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $559.9M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.7M | $106.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.0M | $278.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $127.6M | $53.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $111.1M | $-40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.8M | $140.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.2M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.1M | $56.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | 45.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.9% | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.1% | 50.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | 49.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.0% | 50.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.9% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.5% | 49.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.7% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.5% | 21.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.7% | -6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.2% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.4% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.1% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.1% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | 20.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.1% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.72 | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $0.88 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.75 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.34 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.63 | $1.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.39 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.2M | $866.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $3.1B | $6.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $866.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $28.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $36.2M | $691.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.0M | $870.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.2M | $723.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.3M | $722.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $5.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 1.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.03× | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $152.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $131.4M | $-88.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.2% | -10.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.4% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.22× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $654.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $152.7M | $796.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $120.6M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $327.1M | $-300.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $107.8M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $89.6M | $862.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.9M | $155.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $-252.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-88.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $131.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $111.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $73.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $104.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.22× | 7.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.84× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.56× | -5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.92× | 6.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.98× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.29× | -4.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JKHY
| Processing | $273.5M | 44% |
| Private Public Cloud | $202.7M | 33% |
| On Premise Support | $79.0M | 13% |
| Product Deliveryand Service | $64.1M | 10% |
MAT
Segment breakdown not available.
