vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.4× NVR, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, NVR, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-16.2% CAGR vs -23.1%).
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is a solar module manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, China, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2010. Its subsidiary Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Science and Technology Innovation Board in 2022.
NVR, Inc. is an American company engaged in home construction headquartered in Reston, Virginia. It also operates a mortgage banking and title services business. The company primarily operates on the East Coast of the United States, but its operations encompass 14 states as well as Washington, D.C. In 2021, 22% of the company's revenue was from the Washington metropolitan area.
JKS vs NVR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $1.8B |
| Net Profit | — | $198.4M |
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | 180.4% |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | 10.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -21.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $67.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $2.7B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $363.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $342.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $333.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $299.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $457.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $429.3M |
| Q2 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 180.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.7% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $67.76 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $120.85 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $112.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $108.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.83 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $139.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $130.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $1.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.5B |
| Total Assets | — | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.5B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
