vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and Primo Brands Corp (PRMB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.5× Primo Brands Corp). Over the past eight quarters, Primo Brands Corp's revenue compounded faster (19.7% CAGR vs -23.1%).
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is a solar module manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, China, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2010. Its subsidiary Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Science and Technology Innovation Board in 2022.
Primo Brands Corporation is an American-Canadian water company offering multi-gallon bottled water, water dispensers, self-service refill water machines, and water filtration appliances. The company is headquartered in Tampa, Florida, and services residential and commercial customers across the United States, Canada, Europe and Israel.
JKS vs PRMB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | — | $27.3M |
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | 28.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -4.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.3B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $27.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.5M |
| Q2 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | 32.7% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-20.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | — | $10.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $376.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-296.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $103.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.80× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $103.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $203.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $283.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $155.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $38.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $102.5M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $167.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $101.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-23.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $61.4M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.7% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.1% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 3.80× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.88× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JKS
Segment breakdown not available.
PRMB
| Regional spring water | $801.2M | 49% |
| Purified water | $511.2M | 31% |
| Other | $208.2M | 13% |
| Premium water | $105.5M | 6% |
