vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) and W. R. Berkley Corporation (WRB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
W. R. Berkley Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.5× JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.). Over the past eight quarters, W. R. Berkley Corporation's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -23.1%).
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. is a solar module manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, China, and listed on the New York Stock Exchange since 2010. Its subsidiary Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. was listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Science and Technology Innovation Board in 2022.
William Robert Berkley is the founder and current chairman of W. R. Berkley Corporation and the chairman of the New York University Board of Trustees.
JKS vs WRB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | — | $515.2M |
| Gross Margin | 0.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | — | 14.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $3.4B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $515.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $449.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $511.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $401.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $417.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $576.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $365.6M |
| Q2 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.7% | — |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.0% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $1.31 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | — |
| Total Assets | — | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4B |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $44.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $44.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $43.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $42.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $41.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $40.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $40.4B |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
