vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL) and MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. (MRSH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $6.4B, roughly 1.2× JONES LANG LASALLE INC). MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. runs the higher net margin — 15.1% vs 2.5%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JONES LANG LASALLE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 7.6%). Over the past eight quarters, MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (10.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., doing business as Marsh McLennan and Marsh, is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, which offers risk management, insurance broking, insurance program management, risk consulting, analytical modeling and alternative risk financing services; ...
JLL vs MRSH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $7.6B |
| Net Profit | $159.0M | $1.1B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 23.1% |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 15.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $7.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $6.2B |
| Q1 26 | $159.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $401.8M | $821.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.4M | $747.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.2M | $788.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | $747.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.4M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | 3.2% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 18.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 26.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 18.1% |
| Q1 26 | $3.33 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.33 | $1.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.61 | $1.51 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.32 | $2.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.14 | $2.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.98 | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.20 | $1.51 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.75 | $2.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $436.2M | $1.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $20.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $14.8M |
| Total Assets | $17.9B | $58.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.39× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $436.2M | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $599.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.9M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $401.4M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.3M | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.8M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $424.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $20.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $19.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.8B |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | $14.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $15.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $15.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $16.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $14.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $13.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $13.6B |
| Q1 26 | $17.9B | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.8B | $58.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $58.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $58.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $57.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8B | $56.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8B | $49.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | $48.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.94× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-17.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-819.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -12.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-17.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.8M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-767.6M | $-622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $927.3M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.9M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $-819.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-677.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | -0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | 2.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | 2.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.01× | 1.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.35× | -0.45× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.84× | 2.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | 1.08× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JLL
| Real Estate Management Services | $5.1B | 79% |
| Leasing Advisory | $686.3M | 11% |
| Capital Markets Services | $535.2M | 8% |
| Investment Management | $99.3M | 2% |
MRSH
| Marsh Risk | $3.7B | 49% |
| Mercer | $1.7B | 22% |
| Guy Carpenter | $1.2B | 16% |
| Marsh Management Consulting | $897.0M | 12% |
