vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of JONES LANG LASALLE INC (JLL) and Supermicro (SMCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Supermicro is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.2B vs $6.4B, roughly 1.6× JONES LANG LASALLE INC). Supermicro runs the higher net margin — 4.7% vs 2.5%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Supermicro posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (122.7% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Supermicro's revenue compounded faster (38.3% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global real estate services company headquartered in Chicago. The company has offices in 80 countries. It offers investment management services worldwide, including services to institutional and retail investors, and to high-net-worth individuals, as well as technology products through JLL Technologies, and venture capital investments through its PropTech fund, JLL Spark. The company is ranked 188 on the Fortune 500.
Super Micro Computer, Inc., doing business as Supermicro, is an American information technology company based in San Jose, California. The company is one of the largest producers of high-performance and high-efficiency servers, while also providing server management software, and storage systems for various markets, including enterprise data centers, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, 5G, and edge computing.
JLL vs SMCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $10.2B |
| Net Profit | $159.0M | $483.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.2% | 6.1% |
| Net Margin | 2.5% | 4.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 122.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 344.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $3.33 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.4B | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.6B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | $159.0M | $483.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $401.8M | $400.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $222.4M | $168.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.5M | $195.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.5M | $108.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $241.2M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $155.1M | $424.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.4M | $297.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.2% |
| Q1 26 | 3.2% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.7% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 5.4% |
| Q1 26 | 2.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | $3.33 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.33 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.61 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.32 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.14 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.98 | $0.51 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.20 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.75 | $-12.49 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $436.2M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.4B | $7.6B |
| Total Assets | $17.9B | $23.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $436.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $599.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.9M | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $401.4M | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $432.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $416.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $437.8M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $424.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $7.4B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $5.4B |
| Q1 26 | $17.9B | $23.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $17.8B | $28.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.2B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.3B | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6B | $10.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.9B | $9.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-17.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-819.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -12.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-17.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $-23.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $617.1M | $-917.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.8M | $863.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-767.6M | $626.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $927.3M | $-239.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $261.6M | $408.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $273.9M | $-641.8M |
| Q1 26 | $-819.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-949.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $840.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $594.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-267.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $364.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-655.8M |
| Q1 26 | -12.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -18.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% |
| Q1 26 | -0.11× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | -0.06× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | -5.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.01× | 4.43× | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.35× | 5.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.84× | -0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 0.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.25× | -2.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JLL
| Real Estate Management Services | $5.1B | 79% |
| Leasing Advisory | $686.3M | 11% |
| Capital Markets Services | $535.2M | 8% |
| Investment Management | $99.3M | 2% |
SMCI
Segment breakdown not available.
