vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) and KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. (KMTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Joby Aviation, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.8M vs $22.6M, roughly 1.4× KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.). KESTRA MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-25.6M vs $-563.8M).
Joby Aviation is a United States venture-backed aviation company, developing an electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft that it intends to operate as an air taxi service. Joby Aviation is headquartered in Santa Cruz, California and has offices in San Carlos, California; Marina, California; and Munich, Germany.
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd. is a medical device firm that develops, manufactures and commercializes innovative minimally invasive therapeutic solutions, mainly for interventional cardiology and structural heart disease treatment. It operates across North America, Europe and key Asia-Pacific markets, serving global healthcare providers and patients.
JOBY vs KMTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.8M | $22.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-32.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -140.7% |
| Net Margin | — | -145.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 55965.5% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.64 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.8M | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $19.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $0 | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-32.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-401.2M | $-25.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-82.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-286.1M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-113.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -140.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -804.8% | -149.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -145.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1777.4% | -133.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.64 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.48 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $175.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $164.1M |
| Total Assets | $1.8B | $246.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $175.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $978.1M | $201.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $812.5M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $977.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $164.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $896.5M | $184.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $859.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $246.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $266.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.2B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-509.9M | $-18.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-563.8M | $-25.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1828.4% | -113.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 174.9% | 32.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-930.7M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-509.9M | $-18.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-139.2M | $-26.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-111.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-80.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-71.7M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-78.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-563.8M | $-25.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-152.2M | $-34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-125.9M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-88.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-77.1M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-87.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -1828.4% | -113.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -674.3% | -177.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 174.9% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 57.7% | 42.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -52.57× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
