vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC (JOUT) and Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. (MEG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($193.3M vs $140.9M, roughly 1.4× JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC). JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC runs the higher net margin — -2.3% vs -4.3%, a 1.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.9% vs 2.2%). Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($46.5M vs $-42.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Montrose Environmental Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.5% CAGR vs -10.5%).

Johnson Outdoors Inc. produces outdoor recreational products such as watercraft, diving equipment, camping gear, and outdoor clothing. It has operations in 24 locations worldwide, employs 1,400 people and reports sales of more than $315 million. Helen Johnson-Leipold, one of Samuel Curtis Johnson, Jr.'s four children, has run the company since 1999.

Montrose Environmental Group, Inc. is an American multinational corporation that provides wide-ranging environmental services. The company is vertically integrated across the environmental industry and supports public and private sector clientele. Montrose is headquartered in Little Rock, Arkansas and incorporated in the U.S. state of Delaware.

JOUT vs MEG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MEG
MEG
1.4× larger
MEG
$193.3M
$140.9M
JOUT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
JOUT
JOUT
+28.7% gap
JOUT
30.9%
2.2%
MEG
Higher net margin
JOUT
JOUT
1.9% more per $
JOUT
-2.3%
-4.3%
MEG
More free cash flow
MEG
MEG
$89.3M more FCF
MEG
$46.5M
$-42.7M
JOUT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MEG
MEG
Annualised
MEG
11.5%
-10.5%
JOUT

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Revenue
$140.9M
$193.3M
Net Profit
$-3.3M
$-8.2M
Gross Margin
36.6%
38.6%
Operating Margin
-2.1%
-1.3%
Net Margin
-2.3%
-4.3%
Revenue YoY
30.9%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
78.4%
70.9%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$140.9M
Q4 25
$135.8M
$193.3M
Q3 25
$224.9M
Q2 25
$180.7M
$234.5M
Q1 25
$168.3M
$177.8M
Q4 24
$107.6M
$189.1M
Q3 24
$105.9M
$178.7M
Q2 24
$172.5M
$173.3M
Net Profit
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$-3.3M
Q4 25
$-29.1M
$-8.2M
Q3 25
$8.4M
Q2 25
$7.7M
$18.4M
Q1 25
$2.3M
$-19.4M
Q4 24
$-15.3M
$-28.2M
Q3 24
$-34.3M
$-10.6M
Q2 24
$1.6M
$-10.2M
Gross Margin
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
36.6%
Q4 25
36.2%
38.6%
Q3 25
39.4%
Q2 25
37.6%
43.4%
Q1 25
35.0%
39.0%
Q4 24
29.9%
40.8%
Q3 24
23.5%
40.9%
Q2 24
35.8%
39.9%
Operating Margin
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
-2.1%
Q4 25
-6.0%
-1.3%
Q3 25
4.4%
Q2 25
4.1%
6.4%
Q1 25
2.9%
-5.9%
Q4 24
-18.8%
-12.1%
Q3 24
-40.4%
-0.6%
Q2 24
-0.3%
-1.5%
Net Margin
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
-2.3%
Q4 25
-21.4%
-4.3%
Q3 25
3.7%
Q2 25
4.3%
7.8%
Q1 25
1.4%
-10.9%
Q4 24
-14.2%
-14.9%
Q3 24
-32.4%
-5.9%
Q2 24
0.9%
-5.9%
EPS (diluted)
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-0.13
Q3 25
$0.21
Q2 25
$0.42
Q1 25
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.91
Q3 24
$-0.39
Q2 24
$-0.39

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$130.7M
$11.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$0
$277.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$413.5M
$451.2M
Total Assets
$600.1M
$981.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×
0.61×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$130.7M
Q4 25
$176.4M
$11.2M
Q3 25
$6.7M
Q2 25
$161.0M
$10.5M
Q1 25
$94.0M
$30.3M
Q4 24
$101.6M
$12.9M
Q3 24
$162.0M
$13.0M
Q2 24
$148.4M
$16.9M
Total Debt
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$0
$277.1M
Q3 25
$302.4M
Q2 25
$0
$264.6M
Q1 25
$0
$235.6M
Q4 24
$0
$204.8M
Q3 24
$0
$233.0M
Q2 24
$0
$188.7M
Stockholders' Equity
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$413.5M
Q4 25
$418.4M
$451.2M
Q3 25
$458.7M
Q2 25
$450.5M
$470.3M
Q1 25
$441.1M
$444.1M
Q4 24
$440.3M
$446.3M
Q3 24
$463.4M
$449.2M
Q2 24
$498.7M
$448.8M
Total Assets
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$600.1M
Q4 25
$604.1M
$981.3M
Q3 25
$985.7M
Q2 25
$634.5M
$998.1M
Q1 25
$624.5M
$992.2M
Q4 24
$612.9M
$990.4M
Q3 24
$635.2M
$1.0B
Q2 24
$679.8M
$943.9M
Debt / Equity
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
0.00×
Q4 25
0.00×
0.61×
Q3 25
0.66×
Q2 25
0.00×
0.56×
Q1 25
0.00×
0.53×
Q4 24
0.00×
0.46×
Q3 24
0.00×
0.52×
Q2 24
0.00×
0.42×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-38.4M
$51.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-42.7M
$46.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-30.3%
24.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.0%
2.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$38.5M
$91.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$-38.4M
Q4 25
$23.4M
$51.9M
Q3 25
$28.1M
Q2 25
$71.4M
$21.9M
Q1 25
$-1.7M
$5.5M
Q4 24
$-36.9M
$32.0M
Q3 24
$19.1M
$11.4M
Q2 24
$73.7M
$894.0K
Free Cash Flow
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
$-42.7M
Q4 25
$19.2M
$46.5M
Q3 25
$22.3M
Q2 25
$66.9M
$19.9M
Q1 25
$-5.0M
$2.4M
Q4 24
$-41.0M
$29.7M
Q3 24
$13.5M
$10.2M
Q2 24
$67.4M
$-9.8M
FCF Margin
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
-30.3%
Q4 25
14.2%
24.1%
Q3 25
9.9%
Q2 25
37.0%
8.5%
Q1 25
-2.9%
1.3%
Q4 24
-38.1%
15.7%
Q3 24
12.8%
5.7%
Q2 24
39.1%
-5.6%
Capex Intensity
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
3.0%
Q4 25
3.1%
2.8%
Q3 25
2.6%
Q2 25
2.5%
0.8%
Q1 25
2.0%
1.8%
Q4 24
3.8%
1.2%
Q3 24
5.3%
0.6%
Q2 24
3.6%
6.1%
Cash Conversion
JOUT
JOUT
MEG
MEG
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
3.36×
Q2 25
9.22×
1.19×
Q1 25
-0.72×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
45.41×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

JOUT
JOUT

Fishing Segment$112.1M80%
Diving Segment$18.0M13%
Camping Watercraft Recreation Segment$10.6M8%

MEG
MEG

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons