vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) and N-able, Inc. (NABL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
James River Group Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.4M vs $130.3M, roughly 1.2× N-able, Inc.). On growth, N-able, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.8% vs -12.1%). Over the past eight quarters, N-able, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.0% CAGR vs -10.3%).
James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.
Able UK is a British industrial services company specialising in decommissioning of ships and offshore installations.
JRVR vs NABL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $130.3M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 10.2% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -12.1% | 11.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | $130.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | $131.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.8M | $131.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | $118.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.7M | $116.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.5M | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.3M | $119.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-64.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.4M | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $9.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 78.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 76.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 80.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 84.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.0% | 13.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.1% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 18.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.44 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.10 | $0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.2M | $111.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $393.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $518.4M | $804.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.49× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $228.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $260.9M | $111.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.8M | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0M | $93.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.4M | $94.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.3M | $85.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.8M | $174.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $672.5M | $157.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $393.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $331.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $332.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $333.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $333.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $334.1M |
| Q1 26 | $518.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $538.2M | $804.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $503.6M | $813.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.6M | $809.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $484.5M | $775.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.9M | $759.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.3M | $765.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.8M | $724.4M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $20.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $75.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-18.8M | $25.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $24.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.5M | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-247.1M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-269.9M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.7M | $27.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-23.6M | $20.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | $17.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.7M | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-252.0M | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-270.8M | $18.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.3M | $24.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.6% | 13.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -198.9% | 16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -141.4% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | 20.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.61× | 17.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.14× | 2.89× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
JRVR
Segment breakdown not available.
NABL
| Transferred Over Time | $121.9M | 94% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $8.4M | 6% |
| Other Revenue | $1.3M | 1% |
