vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) and Nayax Ltd. (NYAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
James River Group Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.4M vs $78.1M, roughly 1.9× Nayax Ltd.). On growth, Nayax Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (39.0% vs -12.1%).
James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.
Nayax Ltd. is a global fintech company that offers cashless, telemetry, management, monitoring, and business intelligence (BI) products and services for the vending, unattended, and other retail industries.
JRVR vs NYAX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $78.1M |
| Net Profit | — | $-3.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 1.2% |
| Net Margin | — | -3.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.1% | 39.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.3M | $78.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-64.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $-3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -3.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.44 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.10 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.2M | $61.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $518.4M | $158.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $434.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $228.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $260.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $672.5M | $61.9M |
| Q1 26 | $518.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $538.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $503.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $484.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.8M | $158.7M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $434.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-18.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-51.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-247.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-269.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.7M | $9.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-23.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-252.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-270.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-9.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -30.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -198.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -141.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.61× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.29× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.14× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
