vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) and Sezzle Inc. (SEZL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
James River Group Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.4M vs $135.5M, roughly 1.1× Sezzle Inc.). On growth, Sezzle Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.2% vs -12.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Sezzle Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (111.9% CAGR vs -10.3%).
James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.
Sezzle is a publicly traded financial technology company headquartered in Minneapolis, U.S, with operations in the United States and Canada. The company provides an alternative payment platform offering interest-free installment plans at selected online stores. As of June 2021, the Sezzle platform had over 10 million user sign-ups and over 48,000 participating merchants.
JRVR vs SEZL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $135.5M |
| Net Profit | — | $51.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | — | 37.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.1% | 29.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 41.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | $135.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | $57.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.8M | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | $48.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.7M | $48.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.5M | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.3M | $30.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1M | $42.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $26.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $36.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-64.8M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.4M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $29.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 70.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 61.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | 69.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.0% | 63.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.1% | 58.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 55.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | 54.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | 46.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 53.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.1% | 52.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.6% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 98.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $1.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.44 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.10 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $518.4M | $196.7M |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $454.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $228.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $260.9M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.8M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0M | $88.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.4M | $88.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.3M | $73.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.8M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $672.5M | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | $518.4M | $196.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $538.2M | $169.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $503.6M | $155.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.6M | $130.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $484.5M | $125.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.9M | $87.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.3M | $61.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.8M | $50.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | $454.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $400.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $350.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $298.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $298.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $252.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $212.1M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
