vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $167.7M, roughly 1.5× James River Group Holdings, Inc.). James River Group Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.1% vs 10.6%, a 8.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, James River Group Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (32.4% vs 2.4%). Tecnoglass Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($11.4M vs $-23.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -8.7%).

James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.

Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.

JRVR vs TGLS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TGLS
TGLS
1.5× larger
TGLS
$245.3M
$167.7M
JRVR
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
JRVR
JRVR
+30.0% gap
JRVR
32.4%
2.4%
TGLS
Higher net margin
JRVR
JRVR
8.5% more per $
JRVR
19.1%
10.6%
TGLS
More free cash flow
TGLS
TGLS
$35.0M more FCF
TGLS
$11.4M
$-23.6M
JRVR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TGLS
TGLS
Annualised
TGLS
12.8%
-8.7%
JRVR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Revenue
$167.7M
$245.3M
Net Profit
$32.1M
$26.1M
Gross Margin
40.0%
Operating Margin
14.6%
18.3%
Net Margin
19.1%
10.6%
Revenue YoY
32.4%
2.4%
Net Profit YoY
149.5%
-44.5%
EPS (diluted)
$0.59
$0.57

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$167.7M
$245.3M
Q3 25
$172.7M
$260.5M
Q2 25
$174.8M
$255.5M
Q1 25
$172.3M
$222.3M
Q4 24
$126.7M
$239.6M
Q3 24
$191.5M
$238.3M
Q2 24
$188.3M
$219.7M
Q1 24
$201.1M
$192.6M
Net Profit
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$32.1M
$26.1M
Q3 25
$1.0M
$47.2M
Q2 25
$4.8M
$44.1M
Q1 25
$9.6M
$42.2M
Q4 24
$-64.8M
$47.0M
Q3 24
$-39.4M
$49.5M
Q2 24
$7.6M
$35.0M
Q1 24
$15.4M
$29.7M
Gross Margin
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
40.0%
Q3 25
42.7%
Q2 25
44.7%
Q1 25
43.9%
Q4 24
44.5%
Q3 24
45.8%
Q2 24
40.8%
Q1 24
38.8%
Operating Margin
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
14.6%
18.3%
Q3 25
1.5%
25.1%
Q2 25
4.2%
24.0%
Q1 25
9.3%
26.7%
Q4 24
-57.0%
28.0%
Q3 24
-27.1%
28.4%
Q2 24
10.7%
23.3%
Q1 24
16.4%
21.3%
Net Margin
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
19.1%
10.6%
Q3 25
0.6%
18.1%
Q2 25
2.7%
17.3%
Q1 25
5.6%
19.0%
Q4 24
-51.1%
19.6%
Q3 24
-20.6%
20.8%
Q2 24
4.0%
15.9%
Q1 24
7.7%
15.4%
EPS (diluted)
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$0.59
$0.57
Q3 25
$-0.02
$1.01
Q2 25
$0.06
$0.94
Q1 25
$0.16
$0.90
Q4 24
$-2.44
$1.00
Q3 24
$-1.10
$1.05
Q2 24
$0.13
$0.75
Q1 24
$0.35
$0.63

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$260.9M
$104.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$174.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$538.2M
$713.1M
Total Assets
$4.9B
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.24×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$260.9M
$104.1M
Q3 25
$238.8M
$127.1M
Q2 25
$220.0M
$140.9M
Q1 25
$279.4M
$160.2M
Q4 24
$362.3M
$137.5M
Q3 24
$359.8M
$124.8M
Q2 24
$672.5M
$129.5M
Q1 24
$305.5M
$138.8M
Total Debt
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$174.4M
Q3 25
$114.7M
Q2 25
$110.6M
Q1 25
$110.6M
Q4 24
$111.1M
Q3 24
$126.8M
Q2 24
$144.7M
Q1 24
$160.9M
Stockholders' Equity
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$538.2M
$713.1M
Q3 25
$503.6M
$764.0M
Q2 25
$492.6M
$736.0M
Q1 25
$484.5M
$685.1M
Q4 24
$460.9M
$631.2M
Q3 24
$530.3M
$613.3M
Q2 24
$541.8M
$574.8M
Q1 24
$539.5M
$573.6M
Total Assets
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$4.9B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$5.0B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$5.0B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$4.9B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$5.0B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$5.0B
$996.3M
Q2 24
$4.7B
$942.5M
Q1 24
$5.3B
$981.6M
Debt / Equity
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
0.24×
Q3 25
0.15×
Q2 25
0.15×
Q1 25
0.16×
Q4 24
0.18×
Q3 24
0.21×
Q2 24
0.25×
Q1 24
0.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-18.8M
$31.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-23.6M
$11.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-14.1%
4.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.9%
8.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-0.59×
1.19×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-17.9M
$34.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$-18.8M
$31.0M
Q3 25
$34.3M
$40.0M
Q2 25
$25.2M
$17.9M
Q1 25
$-51.5M
$46.9M
Q4 24
$-247.1M
$61.1M
Q3 24
$-269.9M
$41.5M
Q2 24
$-8.7M
$34.5M
Q1 24
$24.1M
$33.4M
Free Cash Flow
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
$-23.6M
$11.4M
Q3 25
$33.7M
$21.2M
Q2 25
$24.7M
$-14.7M
Q1 25
$-52.7M
$16.5M
Q4 24
$-252.0M
$35.4M
Q3 24
$-270.8M
$17.8M
Q2 24
$-9.3M
$14.2M
Q1 24
$23.3M
$23.6M
FCF Margin
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
-14.1%
4.7%
Q3 25
19.5%
8.2%
Q2 25
14.1%
-5.7%
Q1 25
-30.6%
7.4%
Q4 24
-198.9%
14.8%
Q3 24
-141.4%
7.5%
Q2 24
-4.9%
6.5%
Q1 24
11.6%
12.2%
Capex Intensity
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
2.9%
8.0%
Q3 25
0.4%
7.2%
Q2 25
0.3%
12.7%
Q1 25
0.7%
13.7%
Q4 24
3.9%
10.7%
Q3 24
0.4%
9.9%
Q2 24
0.3%
9.2%
Q1 24
0.4%
5.1%
Cash Conversion
JRVR
JRVR
TGLS
TGLS
Q4 25
-0.59×
1.19×
Q3 25
33.61×
0.85×
Q2 25
5.29×
0.41×
Q1 25
-5.38×
1.11×
Q4 24
1.30×
Q3 24
0.84×
Q2 24
-1.14×
0.98×
Q1 24
1.56×
1.13×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

JRVR
JRVR

Excess And Surplus Lines$156.7M93%
Specialty Admitted Insurance$10.9M7%

TGLS
TGLS

Product Sales$164.2M67%
Fixed Price Contracts$81.1M33%
Related Party$692.0K0%

Related Comparisons