vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of James River Group Holdings, Inc. (JRVR) and TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC (TNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($247.2M vs $151.4M, roughly 1.6× James River Group Holdings, Inc.). On growth, TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.5% vs -12.1%). Over the past eight quarters, TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -10.3%).
James River Corporation was an American pulp and paper company based in Richmond, Virginia, once the largest paper manufacturer in the world.
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. is an American medical device manufacturer based in San Diego, California. The company develops medical technologies for the treatment of diabetes and specifically insulin infusion therapy.
JRVR vs TNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.4M | $247.2M |
| Net Profit | — | $-20.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | 37.6% |
| Net Margin | — | -8.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -12.1% | 5.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | $247.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.7M | $290.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.7M | $249.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $174.8M | $240.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $172.3M | $234.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.7M | $282.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $191.5M | $244.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $188.3M | $221.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-20.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.1M | $-589.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | $-21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $-52.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.6M | $-130.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-64.8M | $755.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-39.4M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.6M | $-30.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 55.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 57.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 53.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 55.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 14.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | -9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.2% | -21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | -51.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -57.0% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -27.1% | -10.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | -13.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.1% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.6% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -21.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.6% | -55.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -51.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -20.6% | -9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | -13.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.59 | $0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.06 | $-0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $-1.97 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.44 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.10 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.13 | $-0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $228.2M | $570.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $518.4M | $132.4M |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $228.2M | $570.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $260.9M | $292.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $238.8M | $319.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0M | $315.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $279.4M | $368.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.3M | $438.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $359.8M | $473.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $672.5M | $452.4M |
| Q1 26 | $518.4M | $132.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $538.2M | $155.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $503.6M | $133.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $492.6M | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $484.5M | $155.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $460.9M | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.3M | $237.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.8M | $233.9M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $881.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $874.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $875.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $922.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $967.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $957.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $937.5M |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
