vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Jackson Financial Inc. (JXN) and OSHKOSH CORP (OSK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

OSHKOSH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.4× Jackson Financial Inc.). OSHKOSH CORP runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -10.3%, a 15.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Jackson Financial Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (783.6% vs 3.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Jackson Financial Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (50.1% CAGR vs 2.8%).

Prudential Financial, Inc. is an American financial services company whose subsidiaries provide insurance, retirement planning, investment management, and other products and services to both retail and institutional customers throughout the United States and in over 40 other countries. In 2019, Prudential was the largest insurance provider in the United States with $815.1 billion in total assets. The company is included in the Fortune Global 500 and Fortune 500 rankings.

Oshkosh Corporation, formerly Oshkosh Truck, is an American industrial company that designs and builds specialty trucks, military vehicles, truck bodies, airport fire apparatus, and access equipment. The corporation also owns Pierce Manufacturing, a fire apparatus manufacturer in Appleton, Wisconsin, and JLG Industries, a manufacturer of lift equipment, including aerial lifts, boom lifts, scissor lifts, telehandlers and low-level access lifts.

JXN vs OSK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OSK
OSK
1.4× larger
OSK
$2.7B
$2.0B
JXN
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
JXN
JXN
+780.1% gap
JXN
783.6%
3.5%
OSK
Higher net margin
OSK
OSK
15.2% more per $
OSK
5.0%
-10.3%
JXN
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
JXN
JXN
Annualised
JXN
50.1%
2.8%
OSK

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Revenue
$2.0B
$2.7B
Net Profit
$-204.0M
$133.8M
Gross Margin
15.8%
Operating Margin
-18.0%
7.9%
Net Margin
-10.3%
5.0%
Revenue YoY
783.6%
3.5%
Net Profit YoY
-159.1%
-12.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-3.02

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$2.0B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$-471.0M
$2.7B
Q1 25
$3.8B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$2.6B
Q3 24
$2.1B
$2.7B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$2.8B
Q1 24
$-322.0M
$2.5B
Net Profit
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$-204.0M
$133.8M
Q3 25
$76.0M
$196.2M
Q2 25
$179.0M
$204.8M
Q1 25
$-24.0M
$112.2M
Q4 24
$153.1M
Q3 24
$-469.0M
$180.3M
Q2 24
$275.0M
$168.6M
Q1 24
$795.0M
$179.4M
Gross Margin
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
15.8%
Q3 25
17.5%
Q2 25
19.2%
Q1 25
17.3%
Q4 24
17.2%
Q3 24
18.5%
Q2 24
19.2%
Q1 24
18.5%
Operating Margin
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
-18.0%
7.9%
Q3 25
5.1%
9.7%
Q2 25
10.7%
Q1 25
-0.5%
7.6%
Q4 24
8.6%
Q3 24
-27.3%
9.7%
Q2 24
25.5%
9.2%
Q1 24
10.2%
Net Margin
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
-10.3%
5.0%
Q3 25
5.4%
7.3%
Q2 25
-38.0%
7.5%
Q1 25
-0.6%
4.9%
Q4 24
5.9%
Q3 24
-22.1%
6.6%
Q2 24
22.1%
5.9%
Q1 24
-246.9%
7.1%
EPS (diluted)
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$-3.02
Q3 25
$0.92
Q2 25
$2.34
Q1 25
$-0.48
Q4 24
Q3 24
$-6.37
Q2 24
$3.43
Q1 24
$9.94

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$5.7B
$479.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.0B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.0B
$4.5B
Total Assets
$352.6B
$10.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.20×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$5.7B
$479.8M
Q3 25
$4.6B
$211.8M
Q2 25
$3.8B
$191.7M
Q1 25
$3.9B
$210.3M
Q4 24
$204.9M
Q3 24
$3.1B
$160.9M
Q2 24
$1.7B
$141.4M
Q1 24
$2.5B
$69.9M
Total Debt
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$2.0B
Q3 25
$2.0B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
Q3 24
$2.0B
$602.3M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$599.1M
Q1 24
$2.0B
$598.9M
Stockholders' Equity
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$10.0B
$4.5B
Q3 25
$10.2B
$4.5B
Q2 25
$10.4B
$4.5B
Q1 25
$10.3B
$4.2B
Q4 24
$4.2B
Q3 24
$10.7B
$4.1B
Q2 24
$10.1B
$3.9B
Q1 24
$10.2B
$3.8B
Total Assets
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$352.6B
$10.1B
Q3 25
$353.6B
$9.8B
Q2 25
$343.7B
$10.0B
Q1 25
$327.2B
$9.8B
Q4 24
$9.4B
Q3 24
$345.7B
$9.9B
Q2 24
$337.8B
$9.7B
Q1 24
$340.3B
$9.5B
Debt / Equity
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
0.20×
Q3 25
0.20×
Q2 25
0.20×
Q1 25
0.20×
Q4 24
Q3 24
0.19×
0.15×
Q2 24
0.20×
0.15×
Q1 24
0.20×
0.16×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$1.6B
$600.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$540.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
20.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.49×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$618.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$1.6B
$600.1M
Q3 25
$1.4B
$489.0M
Q2 25
$1.2B
$89.2M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$-394.9M
Q4 24
$790.8M
Q3 24
$1.4B
$326.1M
Q2 24
$1.5B
$-211.0M
Q1 24
$1.4B
$-355.8M
Free Cash Flow
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
$540.3M
Q3 25
$464.3M
Q2 25
$48.6M
Q1 25
$-435.2M
Q4 24
$703.3M
Q3 24
$272.2M
Q2 24
$-250.5M
Q1 24
$-455.9M
FCF Margin
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
20.1%
Q3 25
17.3%
Q2 25
1.8%
Q1 25
-18.8%
Q4 24
27.1%
Q3 24
9.9%
Q2 24
-8.8%
Q1 24
-17.9%
Capex Intensity
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
2.2%
Q3 25
0.9%
Q2 25
1.5%
Q1 25
1.7%
Q4 24
3.4%
Q3 24
2.0%
Q2 24
1.4%
Q1 24
3.9%
Cash Conversion
JXN
JXN
OSK
OSK
Q4 25
4.49×
Q3 25
18.03×
2.49×
Q2 25
6.55×
0.44×
Q1 25
-3.52×
Q4 24
5.17×
Q3 24
1.81×
Q2 24
5.37×
-1.25×
Q1 24
1.79×
-1.98×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

JXN
JXN

Retail Annuities Segment$1.5B74%
Closed Life And Annuity Blocks Segment$298.0M15%
Institutional Products Segment$146.0M7%
Other$70.0M4%

OSK
OSK

Vocational Segment$922.4M34%
Aerial Works Platforms$548.6M20%
Other Access Equipment$311.8M12%
Telehandlers$311.2M12%
Airport Products$252.7M9%
Delivery Vehicles$165.0M6%
Other Vocational$130.7M5%
Transferred Over Time$23.5M1%

Related Comparisons