vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kellanova (K) and LEAR CORP (LEA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LEAR CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.8× Kellanova). Kellanova runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs 1.4%, a 8.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 0.8%). Kellanova produced more free cash flow last quarter ($359.0M vs $281.1M). Over the past eight quarters, LEAR CORP's revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -9.0%).

Kellanova, formerly known as the Kellogg Company, is an American multinational food manufacturing company owned by Mars Inc. headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The renaming took effect on October 2, 2023, and the company's North American cereal operations were spun off to form the WK Kellogg Co at the same time.

Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.

K vs LEA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LEA
LEA
1.8× larger
LEA
$6.0B
$3.3B
K
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LEA
LEA
+4.0% gap
LEA
4.8%
0.8%
K
Higher net margin
K
K
8.1% more per $
K
9.5%
1.4%
LEA
More free cash flow
K
K
$77.9M more FCF
K
$359.0M
$281.1M
LEA
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LEA
LEA
Annualised
LEA
-0.1%
-9.0%
K

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
K
K
LEA
LEA
Revenue
$3.3B
$6.0B
Net Profit
$309.0M
$82.7M
Gross Margin
33.3%
5.7%
Operating Margin
13.9%
2.6%
Net Margin
9.5%
1.4%
Revenue YoY
0.8%
4.8%
Net Profit YoY
-15.8%
-6.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.88
$1.58

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$6.0B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$6.0B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$5.6B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$5.6B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$6.0B
Q1 24
$3.2B
$6.0B
Net Profit
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$82.7M
Q3 25
$309.0M
$108.2M
Q2 25
$299.0M
$165.2M
Q1 25
$304.0M
$80.7M
Q4 24
$365.0M
$88.1M
Q3 24
$367.0M
$135.8M
Q2 24
$344.0M
$173.1M
Q1 24
$267.0M
$109.6M
Gross Margin
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
5.7%
Q3 25
33.3%
6.4%
Q2 25
34.0%
7.3%
Q1 25
34.3%
6.5%
Q4 24
37.7%
6.8%
Q3 24
36.4%
7.3%
Q2 24
36.4%
7.5%
Q1 24
32.2%
6.6%
Operating Margin
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
2.6%
Q3 25
13.9%
3.4%
Q2 25
13.7%
4.1%
Q1 25
13.9%
3.3%
Q4 24
17.0%
3.7%
Q3 24
14.1%
3.9%
Q2 24
15.4%
4.3%
Q1 24
12.3%
3.3%
Net Margin
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
1.4%
Q3 25
9.5%
1.9%
Q2 25
9.3%
2.7%
Q1 25
9.9%
1.5%
Q4 24
11.7%
1.5%
Q3 24
11.4%
2.4%
Q2 24
10.8%
2.9%
Q1 24
8.3%
1.8%
EPS (diluted)
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$1.58
Q3 25
$0.88
$2.02
Q2 25
$0.85
$3.06
Q1 25
$0.87
$1.49
Q4 24
$1.05
$1.64
Q3 24
$1.05
$2.41
Q2 24
$1.00
$3.02
Q1 24
$0.78
$1.90

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
K
K
LEA
LEA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$240.0M
$1.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.3B
$2.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.2B
$5.0B
Total Assets
$15.6B
$14.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.02×
0.54×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$1.0B
Q3 25
$240.0M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$354.0M
$887.9M
Q1 25
$330.0M
$779.9M
Q4 24
$694.0M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$569.0M
$763.9M
Q2 24
$272.0M
$950.3M
Q1 24
$242.0M
$930.4M
Total Debt
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$2.7B
Q3 25
$4.3B
$2.8B
Q2 25
$4.3B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$5.0B
$2.7B
Q4 24
$5.0B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$5.1B
$2.8B
Q2 24
$5.0B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$4.4B
$2.7B
Stockholders' Equity
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$5.0B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$5.1B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$5.1B
Q1 25
$3.9B
$4.7B
Q4 24
$3.8B
$4.5B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$4.8B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$4.8B
Q1 24
$3.2B
$4.9B
Total Assets
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$14.8B
Q3 25
$15.6B
$15.2B
Q2 25
$15.9B
$15.3B
Q1 25
$15.5B
$14.6B
Q4 24
$15.6B
$14.0B
Q3 24
$15.8B
$14.8B
Q2 24
$15.3B
$14.7B
Q1 24
$15.3B
$14.9B
Debt / Equity
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
0.54×
Q3 25
1.02×
0.54×
Q2 25
1.05×
0.54×
Q1 25
1.28×
0.59×
Q4 24
1.32×
0.61×
Q3 24
1.40×
0.58×
Q2 24
1.51×
0.57×
Q1 24
1.40×
0.56×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
K
K
LEA
LEA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$503.0M
$475.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$359.0M
$281.1M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.0%
4.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
3.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.63×
5.75×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$599.0M
$527.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$475.9M
Q3 25
$503.0M
$444.4M
Q2 25
$169.0M
$296.2M
Q1 25
$116.0M
$-127.7M
Q4 24
$467.0M
$680.8M
Q3 24
$553.0M
$182.7M
Q2 24
$376.0M
$291.2M
Q1 24
$364.0M
$-34.6M
Free Cash Flow
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
$281.1M
Q3 25
$359.0M
$307.0M
Q2 25
$21.0M
$170.8M
Q1 25
$-60.0M
$-231.7M
Q4 24
$279.0M
$488.7M
Q3 24
$410.0M
$50.5M
Q2 24
$234.0M
$170.4M
Q1 24
$209.0M
$-148.2M
FCF Margin
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
4.7%
Q3 25
11.0%
5.4%
Q2 25
0.7%
2.8%
Q1 25
-1.9%
-4.2%
Q4 24
8.9%
8.6%
Q3 24
12.7%
0.9%
Q2 24
7.3%
2.8%
Q1 24
6.5%
-2.5%
Capex Intensity
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
3.3%
Q3 25
4.4%
2.4%
Q2 25
4.6%
2.1%
Q1 25
5.7%
1.9%
Q4 24
6.0%
3.4%
Q3 24
4.4%
2.4%
Q2 24
4.4%
2.0%
Q1 24
4.8%
1.9%
Cash Conversion
K
K
LEA
LEA
Q4 25
5.75×
Q3 25
1.63×
4.11×
Q2 25
0.57×
1.79×
Q1 25
0.38×
-1.58×
Q4 24
1.28×
7.73×
Q3 24
1.51×
1.35×
Q2 24
1.09×
1.68×
Q1 24
1.36×
-0.32×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

K
K

Retail Channel Snacks$2.0B62%
Retail Channel Cereal$678.0M21%
Noodlesand Other$280.0M9%
Frozen And Specialty Channels$275.0M8%

LEA
LEA

Other$3.5B59%
Seating Segment$1.9B32%
E Systems Segment$520.6M9%

Related Comparisons