vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kellanova (K) and Parker Hannifin (PH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Parker Hannifin is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $3.3B, roughly 1.6× Kellanova). On growth, Parker Hannifin posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs 0.8%). Parker Hannifin produced more free cash flow last quarter ($768.0M vs $359.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Parker Hannifin's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -9.0%).

Kellanova, formerly known as the Kellogg Company, is an American multinational food manufacturing company owned by Mars Inc. headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. The renaming took effect on October 2, 2023, and the company's North American cereal operations were spun off to form the WK Kellogg Co at the same time.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

K vs PH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PH
PH
1.6× larger
PH
$5.2B
$3.3B
K
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PH
PH
+8.3% gap
PH
9.1%
0.8%
K
More free cash flow
PH
PH
$409.0M more FCF
PH
$768.0M
$359.0M
K
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PH
PH
Annualised
PH
1.0%
-9.0%
K

Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026

Metric
K
K
PH
PH
Revenue
$3.3B
$5.2B
Net Profit
$309.0M
Gross Margin
33.3%
37.3%
Operating Margin
13.9%
22.8%
Net Margin
9.5%
Revenue YoY
0.8%
9.1%
Net Profit YoY
-15.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.88
$6.60

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$5.2B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$5.1B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$5.2B
Q1 25
$3.1B
$5.0B
Q4 24
$3.1B
$4.7B
Q3 24
$3.2B
$4.9B
Q2 24
$3.2B
$5.2B
Q1 24
$3.2B
$5.1B
Net Profit
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
Q3 25
$309.0M
Q2 25
$299.0M
$923.6M
Q1 25
$304.0M
$961.2M
Q4 24
$365.0M
$948.6M
Q3 24
$367.0M
$698.5M
Q2 24
$344.0M
$785.1M
Q1 24
$267.0M
$726.7M
Gross Margin
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
37.3%
Q3 25
33.3%
37.5%
Q2 25
34.0%
37.3%
Q1 25
34.3%
36.9%
Q4 24
37.7%
36.3%
Q3 24
36.4%
36.8%
Q2 24
36.4%
35.9%
Q1 24
32.2%
35.4%
Operating Margin
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
22.8%
Q3 25
13.9%
23.3%
Q2 25
13.7%
22.7%
Q1 25
13.9%
22.3%
Q4 24
17.0%
20.9%
Q3 24
14.1%
21.6%
Q2 24
15.4%
21.1%
Q1 24
12.3%
20.4%
Net Margin
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
Q3 25
9.5%
Q2 25
9.3%
17.6%
Q1 25
9.9%
19.4%
Q4 24
11.7%
20.0%
Q3 24
11.4%
14.2%
Q2 24
10.8%
15.1%
Q1 24
8.3%
14.3%
EPS (diluted)
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$6.60
Q3 25
$0.88
$6.29
Q2 25
$0.85
$7.16
Q1 25
$0.87
$7.37
Q4 24
$1.05
$7.25
Q3 24
$1.05
$5.34
Q2 24
$1.00
$6.06
Q1 24
$0.78
$5.56

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
K
K
PH
PH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$240.0M
$427.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$4.3B
$7.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.2B
$14.3B
Total Assets
$15.6B
$30.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.02×
0.52×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$427.0M
Q3 25
$240.0M
$473.0M
Q2 25
$354.0M
$467.0M
Q1 25
$330.0M
$408.7M
Q4 24
$694.0M
$395.5M
Q3 24
$569.0M
$371.1M
Q2 24
$272.0M
$422.0M
Q1 24
$242.0M
$415.5M
Total Debt
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$7.5B
Q3 25
$4.3B
$7.5B
Q2 25
$4.3B
$7.5B
Q1 25
$5.0B
$7.4B
Q4 24
$5.0B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$5.1B
$6.7B
Q2 24
$5.0B
$7.2B
Q1 24
$4.4B
$7.3B
Stockholders' Equity
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$14.3B
Q3 25
$4.2B
$13.8B
Q2 25
$4.1B
$13.7B
Q1 25
$3.9B
$13.4B
Q4 24
$3.8B
$13.1B
Q3 24
$3.6B
$12.9B
Q2 24
$3.3B
$12.1B
Q1 24
$3.2B
$11.6B
Total Assets
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$30.5B
Q3 25
$15.6B
$30.7B
Q2 25
$15.9B
$29.5B
Q1 25
$15.5B
$28.9B
Q4 24
$15.6B
$28.3B
Q3 24
$15.8B
$29.6B
Q2 24
$15.3B
$29.3B
Q1 24
$15.3B
$29.6B
Debt / Equity
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
0.52×
Q3 25
1.02×
0.54×
Q2 25
1.05×
0.55×
Q1 25
1.28×
0.55×
Q4 24
1.32×
0.51×
Q3 24
1.40×
0.52×
Q2 24
1.51×
0.59×
Q1 24
1.40×
0.63×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
K
K
PH
PH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$503.0M
$862.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$359.0M
$768.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.0%
14.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
1.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.63×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$599.0M
$3.3B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$862.0M
Q3 25
$503.0M
$782.0M
Q2 25
$169.0M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$116.0M
$630.0M
Q4 24
$467.0M
$934.8M
Q3 24
$553.0M
$744.0M
Q2 24
$376.0M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$364.0M
$795.1M
Free Cash Flow
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
$768.0M
Q3 25
$359.0M
$693.0M
Q2 25
$21.0M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$-60.0M
$542.4M
Q4 24
$279.0M
$813.6M
Q3 24
$410.0M
$648.7M
Q2 24
$234.0M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$209.0M
$715.9M
FCF Margin
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
14.8%
Q3 25
11.0%
13.6%
Q2 25
0.7%
25.5%
Q1 25
-1.9%
10.9%
Q4 24
8.9%
17.2%
Q3 24
12.7%
13.2%
Q2 24
7.3%
21.6%
Q1 24
6.5%
14.1%
Capex Intensity
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
1.8%
Q3 25
4.4%
1.8%
Q2 25
4.6%
2.5%
Q1 25
5.7%
1.8%
Q4 24
6.0%
2.6%
Q3 24
4.4%
1.9%
Q2 24
4.4%
2.3%
Q1 24
4.8%
1.6%
Cash Conversion
K
K
PH
PH
Q4 25
Q3 25
1.63×
Q2 25
0.57×
1.59×
Q1 25
0.38×
0.66×
Q4 24
1.28×
0.99×
Q3 24
1.51×
1.07×
Q2 24
1.09×
1.58×
Q1 24
1.36×
1.09×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

K
K

Retail Channel Snacks$2.0B62%
Retail Channel Cereal$678.0M21%
Noodlesand Other$280.0M9%
Frozen And Specialty Channels$275.0M8%

PH
PH

Filtration And Engineered Materials$1.5B28%
Other$1.1B22%
Motion Systems$893.0M17%
Commercial Aftermarket$619.0M12%
Commercial Original Equipment Manufacturer$561.0M11%
Defense Original Equipment Manufacturer$305.0M6%
Defense Aftermarket$221.0M4%

Related Comparisons