vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KB HOME (KBH) and Virtu Financial, Inc. (VIRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KB HOME is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.5× Virtu Financial, Inc.). Virtu Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.6% vs 6.0%, a 25.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Virtu Financial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (30.7% vs -15.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Virtu Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs 7.4%).
KB Home is an American homebuilding company founded in 1957 as Kaufman & Broad in Detroit, Michigan. It was the first company to be traded on the New York Stock Exchange as a home builder. Its headquarters are in Los Angeles, California.
Virtu Financial, Inc. is an American high-frequency trading company. The company went public on the Nasdaq in 2015.
KBH vs VIRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $101.5M | $346.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 37.4% |
| Net Margin | 6.0% | 31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.3% | 30.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.7% | 82.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.55 | $1.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $969.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $824.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $999.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $837.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $834.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $706.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $693.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $346.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $101.5M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.8M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.9M | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $109.6M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.6M | $94.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $157.3M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $168.4M | $66.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 37.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.9% | 11.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 9.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.99 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.55 | $1.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.61 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.50 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.49 | $1.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.50 | $1.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.04 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.15 | $0.71 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $973.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.9B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $6.7B | $25.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $973.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $707.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $752.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $723.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $872.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $701.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $684.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $25.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $20.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $21.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0B | $19.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.0B | $17.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.8B | $14.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $303.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $290.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.99× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $287.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $303.8M | $518.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $197.7M | $-68.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.4M | $62.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-334.3M | $15.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.6M | $599.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-89.9M | $112.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.5M | $490.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.1M | $495.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $185.8M | $-76.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.9M | $57.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-345.5M | $9.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.6M | $586.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-99.4M | $106.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $51.2M | $486.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.1% | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.5% | -9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.6% | 70.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 70.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.99× | 3.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.80× | -0.89× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.56× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.05× | 0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.90× | 6.37× | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.57× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 7.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KBH
| Home Building | $1.7B | 99% |
| Financial Service | $8.7M | 1% |
VIRT
| Trading income, net | $789.1M | 72% |
| Commissions, net and technology services | $186.6M | 17% |
| Other | $119.6M | 11% |