vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. (KD) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.9B vs $3.7B, roughly 1.0× TELUS CORP). Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1.5% vs -4.8%, a 6.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs 2.2%).
Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is an American multinational information technology infrastructure services provider, headquartered in New York City and created from the spin-off of IBM's infrastructure services business in 2021. The company designs, builds, manages and develops large-scale information systems. The company also has business advisory services. It is currently the world's largest IT infrastructure services provider, and the fifth-largest consulting provider.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
KD vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $57.0M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | 21.8% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.5% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.1% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.5% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.25 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.7B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | — |
| Q4 25 | $57.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $68.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.0M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $215.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-43.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.3% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.5% | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.19 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.3B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $11.3B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.92× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $996.0M | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.92× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.45× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.50× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.12× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.07× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $428.0M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $208.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.51× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $299.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $428.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $146.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-124.0M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $581.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $260.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $149.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $208.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-267.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $151.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-170.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-57.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.51× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.21× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.42× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.36× | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KD
| Principal Markets Segment | $1.4B | 37% |
| United States Segment | $958.0M | 25% |
| Strategic Markets Segment | $905.0M | 23% |
| Other | $568.0M | 15% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.
