vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KELLY SERVICES INC (KELYB) and ROBERT HALF INC. (RHI), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROBERT HALF INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.1× KELLY SERVICES INC). On growth, KELLY SERVICES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-3.3% vs -5.8%). ROBERT HALF INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($170.8M vs $13.0M). Over the past eight quarters, KELLY SERVICES INC's revenue compounded faster (-3.1% CAGR vs -6.1%).
Kelly Services, Inc. is an American multinational office staffing company. The company places employees at all levels in various sectors including financial services, information technology, and law. Also, its professional services include human resource and management consulting, outsourcing, recruitment, career transition, and vendor management. Kelly Services was founded by William Russell Kelly in 1946 and is headquartered in Troy, Michigan.
Robert Half Inc. is an international human resource consulting firm founded in 1948, based in Menlo Park and San Ramon, California. It is among the world's largest accounting and finance staffing firms, with over 345 locations worldwide.
KELYB vs RHI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | 20.3% | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -3.3% | -5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.86 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $41.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $800.0K | $65.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6M | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.8M | $63.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | 38.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.4% | 39.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.2% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.7% | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.4% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.86 | $0.53 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.02 | $0.64 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.70 | $0.61 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.0M | $464.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $239.4M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.6B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.19× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $464.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $365.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $380.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $342.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.0M | $537.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $32.8M | $570.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.2M | $547.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $200.7M | $540.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $228.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $210.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.16× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $15.0M | $182.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.0M | $170.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.1% | 13.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $15.8M | $266.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | — | $182.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $77.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-59.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $154.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | $129.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.7M | $142.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-25.5M | $-15.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $170.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $104.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-71.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $140.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-22.7M | $111.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.7M | $129.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-29.2M | $-27.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.2% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.8% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.4% | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -25.38× | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.54× | 2.08× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.99× | -0.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KELYB
| Science Engineering Technology | $295.8M | 25% |
| Education | $293.1M | 25% |
| Staffing Services | $237.7M | 20% |
| Other | $138.8M | 12% |
| Talent Solutions | $120.5M | 10% |
| Outcome Based Services | $103.6M | 9% |
| Permanent Placement | $1.6M | 0% |
RHI
| Finance And Accounting | $535.2M | 41% |
| Protiviti | $479.0M | 37% |
| Technology | $156.4M | 12% |
| Permanent Placement Talent Solutions | $102.6M | 8% |
| Other | $29.2M | 2% |
