vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KeyCorp (KEY) and TWILIO INC (TWLO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KeyCorp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.4× TWILIO INC). KeyCorp runs the higher net margin — 25.4% vs 6.4%, a 19.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. KeyCorp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.1B vs $132.0M). Over the past eight quarters, KeyCorp's revenue compounded faster (14.4% CAGR vs 14.0%).
Key is a Japanese visual novel studio known for making dramatic and plot-oriented titles. It was formed on July 21, 1998, as a brand under the publisher Visual Arts, and is located in Kita, Osaka.
Twilio Inc. is an American cloud communications company based in San Francisco, California, which provides programmable communication tools for making and receiving phone calls, sending and receiving text messages, and performing other communication functions using its web service APIs.
KEY vs TWLO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $510.0M | $90.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.6% |
| Operating Margin | 32.3% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | 25.4% | 6.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 131.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 309.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.43 | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $865.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $695.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $90.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $510.0M | $-45.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $489.0M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $425.0M | $22.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-244.0M | $-12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-410.0M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $274.0M | $-31.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 49.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 50.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 51.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.3% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -92.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -72.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | -1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.4% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.7% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -59.0% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | -2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.43 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.41 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.33 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.47 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.25 | $-0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.2B | $542.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $9.9B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.4B | $7.8B |
| Total Assets | $184.4B | $9.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $542.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | $682.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.3B | $734.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.6B | $969.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.3B | $467.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.5B | $421.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.8B | $584.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5B | $755.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | $992.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.9B | $991.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | $991.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.4B | $991.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.1B | $990.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7B | $990.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.9B | $989.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.4B | $7.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.0B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2B | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.9B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $8.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $184.4B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $187.4B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $185.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.7B | $9.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.2B | $9.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $189.8B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $187.4B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.54× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.65× | 0.12× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.67× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.14× | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.2B | $153.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.1B | $132.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 104.8% | 9.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.33× | 1.70× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $3.5B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $153.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $271.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.0M | $263.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $277.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-140.0M | $191.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $664.0M | $108.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | $204.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-217.0M | $213.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $132.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $367.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $599.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-230.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 104.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 65.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 69.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -175.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -15.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 7.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | 12.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.35× | 9.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.79× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
