vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Keysight Technologies (KEYS) and Option Care Health, Inc. (OPCH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Option Care Health, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $1.4B, roughly 1.0× Keysight Technologies). Keysight Technologies runs the higher net margin — 16.4% vs 3.6%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Option Care Health, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.2% vs 10.3%). Keysight Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($187.0M vs $130.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Option Care Health, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (13.0% CAGR vs 6.2%).
Keysight Technologies, Inc. is an American company that manufactures electronics test and measurement equipment and software. The company was formed as a spin-off of Agilent Technologies, which inherited and rebranded the test and measurement product lines developed and produced, from the late 1960s to the turn of the millennium, by Hewlett-Packard's Test and Measurement division. Its name is a portmanteau of key and insight.
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
KEYS vs OPCH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $233.0M | $51.8M |
| Gross Margin | 61.2% | 19.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 5.9% |
| Net Margin | 16.4% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.3% | 12.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 419.2% | -3.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.35 | $0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $233.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.0M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $257.0M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $169.0M | $46.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-73.0M | $60.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $389.0M | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.0M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.0M | $44.8M |
| Q4 25 | 61.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 61.7% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.3% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.2% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 62.3% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.0% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 62.7% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 64.6% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.9% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.6% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 16.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.7% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | $1.35 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.49 | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.97 | $0.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.41 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.22 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.72 | $0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $309.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.9B | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $11.3B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.43× | 0.86× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $309.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.1B | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $171.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $412.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $376.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $219.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.1B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.45× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.46× | 0.82× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.35× | 0.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.35× | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.34× | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.37× | 0.79× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.38× | 0.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $225.0M | $139.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $187.0M | $130.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 13.2% | 9.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.97× | 2.69× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3B | $220.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $225.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $322.0M | $139.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $484.0M | $90.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $378.0M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $36.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $255.0M | $160.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0M | $195.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $328.0M | $-68.8M |
| Q4 25 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $291.0M | $130.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $457.0M | $81.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $346.0M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $321.0M | $25.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $74.0M | $185.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $281.0M | $-74.6M |
| Q4 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.2% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.3% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 0.97× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.69× | 2.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.88× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.24× | -0.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.66× | 2.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.87× | 3.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.91× | -1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KEYS
| Transferred At Point In Time | $790.0M | 56% |
| Electronicindustrial | $429.0M | 30% |
| Transferred Over Time | $200.0M | 14% |
OPCH
| Commercial Customer | $1.3B | 87% |
| Government Customer | $172.8M | 12% |
| Patient Customer | $10.1M | 1% |
| Corporate Joint Venture | $1.9M | 0% |
