vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KFORCE INC (KFRC) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
KFORCE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($330.4M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.3× PicoCELA Inc.). KFORCE INC runs the higher net margin — 2.4% vs -125.2%, a 127.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. KFORCE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-7.4M vs $-256.6M).
Kforce Inc. is a professional staffing and solutions firm headquartered in the United States. It provides skilled professional placements and specialized workforce solutions primarily across technology, finance & accounting, and healthcare segments, serving a wide range of mid-sized to large enterprise clients nationwide.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
KFRC vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $330.4M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $7.9M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 2.4% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $330.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $332.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $330.0M | $252.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $356.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -114.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | -125.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $117.4M | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $384.8M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $444.0K | $456.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0K | — |
| Q1 26 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $354.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $384.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $373.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $368.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $369.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.4M | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.0K | $-245.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-256.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | -101.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.82× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KFRC
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
