vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of KFORCE INC (KFRC) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $330.4M, roughly 1.3× KFORCE INC). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 2.4%, a 46.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs 0.1%). Verisign produced more free cash flow last quarter ($285.1M vs $-7.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Verisign's revenue compounded faster (5.2% CAGR vs -3.7%).
Kforce Inc. is a professional staffing and solutions firm headquartered in the United States. It provides skilled professional placements and specialized workforce solutions primarily across technology, finance & accounting, and healthcare segments, serving a wide range of mid-sized to large enterprise clients nationwide.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
KFRC vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $330.4M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $7.9M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.4% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.7% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $330.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $332.0M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.6M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $334.3M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $330.0M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.8M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.3M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $356.3M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $7.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.4M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.1M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.1M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.2M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.2% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.7% | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.1% | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.0% | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.5% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.6% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.5% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.29 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.59 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.60 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.3M | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $117.4M | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $384.8M | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3M | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $444.0K | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $349.0K | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.0K | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.0K | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | $117.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $124.6M | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.1M | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.4M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.0M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $154.6M | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $167.4M | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.6M | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | $384.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $365.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $373.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $368.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $357.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $369.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $362.7M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-7.4M | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.2% | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $249.0K | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.0M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.9M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-7.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.7M | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.8M | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.9M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.8M | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | -2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.2% | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.0% | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.82× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.11× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.76× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.97× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.48× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
