vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and KENNAMETAL INC (KMT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

KENNAMETAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($592.6M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.1× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 10.3%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, KENNAMETAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.8% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, KENNAMETAL INC's revenue compounded faster (4.4% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Kennametal, Inc. is a manufacturer of high-performance cutting tools and engineered components used in the aerospace, defense, transportation and oil and gas drilling industries. Its customer base is global.

KIM vs KMT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KMT
KMT
1.1× larger
KMT
$592.6M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KMT
KMT
+18.6% gap
KMT
21.8%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
17.6% more per $
KIM
27.9%
10.3%
KMT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KMT
KMT
Annualised
KMT
4.4%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Revenue
$542.5M
$592.6M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$61.1M
Gross Margin
35.1%
Operating Margin
36.4%
13.4%
Net Margin
27.9%
10.3%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
21.8%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
85.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.75

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
$592.6M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$529.5M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$498.0M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$516.4M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$486.4M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$482.1M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$481.9M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$543.3M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
$61.1M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$33.9M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$23.3M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$21.6M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$31.5M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$17.9M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$22.1M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$37.2M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
35.1%
Q4 25
32.8%
Q3 25
31.0%
Q2 25
28.2%
Q1 25
32.1%
Q4 24
30.1%
Q3 24
31.3%
Q2 24
31.5%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
13.4%
Q4 25
36.4%
9.9%
Q3 25
34.9%
7.5%
Q2 25
39.2%
6.1%
Q1 25
33.6%
9.1%
Q4 24
31.7%
6.6%
Q3 24
33.7%
7.5%
Q2 24
32.1%
11.3%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
10.3%
Q4 25
27.9%
6.4%
Q3 25
25.7%
4.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
4.2%
Q1 25
24.8%
6.5%
Q4 24
31.6%
3.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
4.6%
Q2 24
23.9%
6.8%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
$0.75
Q4 25
$0.44
Q3 25
$0.30
Q2 25
$0.28
Q1 25
$0.41
Q4 24
$0.23
Q3 24
$0.28
Q2 24
$0.47

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$106.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$597.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$2.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
$106.8M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$129.3M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$103.5M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$140.5M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$97.5M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$121.2M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$119.6M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$128.0M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
$597.4M
Q4 25
$7.7B
$597.2M
Q3 25
$597.0M
Q2 25
$596.8M
Q1 25
$596.6M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$596.4M
Q3 24
$596.2M
Q2 24
$596.0M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.2B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.2B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
$2.7B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.5B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.5B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.5B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.45×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
0.46×
Q1 25
0.48×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.49×
Q3 24
0.47×
Q2 24
0.48×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$55.1M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$17.5M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$78.6M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$28.8M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$55.2M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$45.7M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$113.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$42.4M
Q3 25
$-5.5M
Q2 25
$57.1M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$5.3M
Q4 24
$35.9M
Q3 24
$21.0M
Q2 24
$90.3M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
8.0%
Q3 25
-1.1%
Q2 25
11.1%
Q1 25
38.3%
1.1%
Q4 24
7.5%
Q3 24
4.4%
Q2 24
16.6%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
2.4%
Q3 25
0.0%
4.6%
Q2 25
0.0%
4.2%
Q1 25
3.4%
4.8%
Q4 24
4.0%
Q3 24
5.1%
Q2 24
4.3%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
KMT
KMT
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
1.63×
Q3 25
2.41×
0.75×
Q2 25
1.87×
3.64×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.92×
Q4 24
1.44×
3.08×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.07×
Q2 24
2.46×
3.06×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

KMT
KMT

Americas$298.3M50%
EMEA$174.0M29%
Asia Pacific$120.3M20%

Related Comparisons