vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Loews Corporation (L). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Loews Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($827.0M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.5× Kimco Realty). Loews Corporation runs the higher net margin — 48.6% vs 29.8%, a 18.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Loews Corporation posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.8% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Loews Corporation's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Loews Corporation is a diversified US-based conglomerate that operates across multiple key industry segments through its subsidiaries. Its core business lines include property and casualty insurance, natural gas pipeline transportation, hospitality services, and upstream oil and gas exploration and production, primarily serving commercial, consumer and industrial clients across North American markets.

KIM vs L — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
L
L
1.5× larger
L
$827.0M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
L
L
+0.8% gap
L
4.8%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
L
L
18.8% more per $
L
48.6%
29.8%
KIM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
L
L
Annualised
L
7.9%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
L
L
Revenue
$558.0M
$827.0M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$402.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
65.4%
Net Margin
29.8%
48.6%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
4.8%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
115.0%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$1.93

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$827.0M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$732.0M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$769.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$846.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$789.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$683.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$711.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$402.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$504.0M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$391.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$370.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$187.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$401.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$369.0M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
65.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
94.1%
Q2 25
39.2%
70.1%
Q1 25
33.6%
60.8%
Q4 24
31.7%
23.8%
Q3 24
33.7%
80.5%
Q2 24
32.1%
71.3%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
48.6%
Q3 25
25.7%
68.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
50.8%
Q1 25
24.8%
43.7%
Q4 24
31.6%
23.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
58.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
51.9%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$1.93
Q3 25
$2.43
Q2 25
$1.87
Q1 25
$1.74
Q4 24
$0.87
Q3 24
$1.82
Q2 24
$1.67

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
L
L
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$6.0B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$8.4B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$18.7B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$86.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.45×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$6.0B
Q3 25
$159.3M
$5.4B
Q2 25
$226.6M
$4.5B
Q1 25
$131.3M
$4.4B
Q4 24
$688.6M
$4.6B
Q3 24
$789.0M
$5.2B
Q2 24
$126.4M
$4.9B
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$8.4B
Q3 25
$8.4B
Q2 25
$7.9B
Q1 25
$8.4B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$8.9B
Q3 24
$8.8B
Q2 24
$8.6B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$18.7B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$18.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$17.5B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$17.2B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$17.1B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$17.4B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$16.4B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$86.3B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$85.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$84.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$83.1B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$81.9B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$83.6B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$81.1B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.45×
Q3 25
0.46×
Q2 25
0.45×
Q1 25
0.49×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.52×
Q3 24
0.51×
Q2 24
0.52×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
L
L
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$617.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$426.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
51.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
23.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.53×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.7B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$617.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$920.0M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$223.8M
$736.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$941.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$934.0M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$952.0M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
$426.0M
Q3 25
$764.0M
Q2 25
$872.0M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$638.0M
Q4 24
$767.0M
Q3 24
$794.0M
Q2 24
$793.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
51.5%
Q3 25
104.4%
Q2 25
113.4%
Q1 25
38.3%
75.4%
Q4 24
97.2%
Q3 24
116.3%
Q2 24
111.5%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
23.1%
Q3 25
0.0%
21.3%
Q2 25
0.0%
17.4%
Q1 25
3.4%
11.6%
Q4 24
22.1%
Q3 24
20.5%
Q2 24
22.4%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
L
L
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
1.53×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.83×
Q2 25
1.87×
2.57×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.99×
Q4 24
1.44×
5.03×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.33×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.58×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

L
L

Transportation And Storage Of Natural Gas And NG Ls And Ethane Supply And Transportation Services$601.0M73%
Lodging And Related Services$226.0M27%

Related Comparisons