vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and LEGGETT & PLATT INC (LEG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

LEGGETT & PLATT INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($938.6M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 2.7%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -11.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -7.5%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Leggett & Platt (L&P), based in Carthage, Missouri, is an American diversified manufacturer that designs and produces various engineered components and products that can be found in homes and automobiles. The firm was founded in 1883, and consists of 15 business units, 20,000 employee-partners, and 135 manufacturing facilities located in 18 countries.

KIM vs LEG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LEG
LEG
1.7× larger
LEG
$938.6M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+14.4% gap
KIM
3.2%
-11.2%
LEG
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
25.2% more per $
KIM
27.9%
2.7%
LEG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
-7.5%
LEG

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Revenue
$542.5M
$938.6M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$25.1M
Gross Margin
17.9%
Operating Margin
36.4%
2.0%
Net Margin
27.9%
2.7%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
-11.2%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
76.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.18

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$542.5M
$938.6M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$525.2M
$1.1B
Q1 25
$536.6M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$525.4M
$1.1B
Q3 24
$507.6M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$500.2M
$1.1B
Q1 24
$503.8M
$1.1B
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$151.2M
$25.1M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$127.1M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$52.5M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$30.6M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$14.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$44.9M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-602.2M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$31.6M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
17.9%
Q3 25
18.7%
Q2 25
18.2%
Q1 25
18.6%
Q4 24
16.6%
Q3 24
18.2%
Q2 24
16.5%
Q1 24
17.0%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
36.4%
2.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
14.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
6.8%
Q1 25
33.6%
4.4%
Q4 24
31.7%
2.4%
Q3 24
33.7%
5.2%
Q2 24
32.1%
-56.2%
Q1 24
25.9%
3.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
27.9%
2.7%
Q3 25
25.7%
12.3%
Q2 25
31.0%
5.0%
Q1 25
24.8%
3.0%
Q4 24
31.6%
1.3%
Q3 24
26.8%
4.1%
Q2 24
23.9%
-53.4%
Q1 24
-2.2%
2.9%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$0.18
Q3 25
$0.91
Q2 25
$0.38
Q1 25
$0.22
Q4 24
$0.10
Q3 24
$0.33
Q2 24
$-4.39
Q1 24
$0.23

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$587.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$1.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.0B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$3.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
1.46×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$211.6M
$587.4M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$460.7M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$368.8M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$412.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$350.2M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$277.2M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$307.0M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$361.3M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$7.7B
$1.5B
Q3 25
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.8B
Q1 25
$1.9B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$1.6B
Q2 24
$1.7B
Q1 24
$1.8B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$971.8M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$855.0M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$746.8M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$689.4M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$741.0M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$667.6M
Q1 24
$10.6B
$1.3B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$19.7B
$3.5B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.5B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$3.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$3.8B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$3.8B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$4.6B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
0.74×
1.46×
Q3 25
1.54×
Q2 25
2.10×
Q1 25
2.59×
Q4 24
0.75×
2.70×
Q3 24
2.13×
Q2 24
2.55×
Q1 24
1.38×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$121.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$101.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
10.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
2.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
4.84×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$281.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$258.4M
$121.5M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$125.9M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$84.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$6.8M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$122.3M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$95.5M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$94.0M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$-6.1M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
$101.9M
Q3 25
$110.1M
Q2 25
$75.5M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-6.5M
Q4 24
$100.5M
Q3 24
$77.1M
Q2 24
$78.5M
Q1 24
$-32.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
10.9%
Q3 25
10.6%
Q2 25
7.1%
Q1 25
38.3%
-0.6%
Q4 24
9.5%
Q3 24
7.0%
Q2 24
7.0%
Q1 24
-2.9%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
0.0%
2.1%
Q3 25
0.0%
1.5%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.8%
Q1 25
3.4%
1.3%
Q4 24
2.1%
Q3 24
1.7%
Q2 24
1.4%
Q1 24
2.4%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
LEG
LEG
Q4 25
1.71×
4.84×
Q3 25
2.41×
0.99×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.60×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.22×
Q4 24
1.44×
8.61×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.13×
Q2 24
2.46×
Q1 24
-0.19×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

LEG
LEG

Bedding Products$373.8M40%
Flooring And Textile Products Group$196.9M21%
Automotive Group$194.9M21%
Work Furniture Group$66.2M7%
Home Furniture Group$61.0M6%
Hydraulic Cylinders$45.8M5%

Related Comparisons