vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Legence Corp. (LGN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Legence Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($708.0M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.3× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -0.1%, a 29.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Legence Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (26.2% vs 4.0%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Legence Corp is a leading sustainable building and decarbonization solution provider. It delivers energy efficiency optimization, building automation design, renewable energy integration, and low-carbon retrofit services for commercial, industrial, and institutional clients, with core operations across North America to help customers cut costs and reduce carbon footprints.
KIM vs LGN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $558.0M | $708.0M |
| Net Profit | $166.3M | $-576.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | -0.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.0% | 26.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 23.7% | 46.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.46 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $558.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | $708.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | $-576.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | -0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.46 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $176.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $812.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $387.9M |
| Total Assets | $19.6B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 2.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $176.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $812.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $387.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $162.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $137.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 19.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
| Revenues from rental properties, net | $552.8M | 99% |
| Management and other fee income | $5.2M | 1% |
LGN
| Installation And Fabrication | $408.7M | 58% |
| Engineering And Design | $110.9M | 16% |
| Program And Project Management | $101.2M | 14% |
| Maintenance And Service | $87.1M | 12% |
