vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and LA-Z-BOY INC (LZB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $541.6M, roughly 1.0× LA-Z-BOY INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 4.0%, a 25.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 3.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -1.1%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

La-Z-Boy Inc. is an American furniture manufacturer based in Monroe, Michigan, United States, that makes home furniture, including upholstered recliners, sofas, stationary chairs, lift chairs and sleeper sofas. The company employs more than 11,000 people.

KIM vs LZB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.0× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$541.6M
LZB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+0.2% gap
KIM
4.0%
3.8%
LZB
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
25.8% more per $
KIM
29.8%
4.0%
LZB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-1.1%
LZB

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Revenue
$558.0M
$541.6M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$21.6M
Gross Margin
43.1%
Operating Margin
37.2%
5.5%
Net Margin
29.8%
4.0%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
3.8%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-23.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.52

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$558.0M
$541.6M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$522.5M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$492.2M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$570.9M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$521.8M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$521.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$495.5M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$553.5M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$166.3M
$21.6M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$28.9M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$18.2M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$14.9M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$28.4M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$30.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$26.2M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$39.3M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
43.1%
Q4 25
44.2%
Q3 25
42.5%
Q2 25
44.0%
Q1 25
44.3%
Q4 24
44.3%
Q3 24
43.1%
Q2 24
43.4%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
37.2%
5.5%
Q4 25
36.4%
6.9%
Q3 25
34.9%
4.5%
Q2 25
39.2%
5.2%
Q1 25
33.6%
6.7%
Q4 24
31.7%
7.4%
Q3 24
33.7%
6.5%
Q2 24
32.1%
9.1%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
29.8%
4.0%
Q4 25
27.9%
5.5%
Q3 25
25.7%
3.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
2.6%
Q1 25
24.8%
5.4%
Q4 24
31.6%
5.8%
Q3 24
26.8%
5.3%
Q2 24
23.9%
7.1%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$0.46
$0.52
Q4 25
$0.70
Q3 25
$0.44
Q2 25
$0.35
Q1 25
$0.68
Q4 24
$0.71
Q3 24
$0.61
Q2 24
$0.91

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$306.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.0B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$306.1M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$338.5M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$318.5M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$328.4M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$314.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$303.1M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$342.3M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$341.1M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$10.4B
$1.0B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.0B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.0B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.0B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.0B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.0B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$999.2M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.0B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$19.6B
$2.1B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.0B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$1.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.0B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$1.9B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$1.9B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$1.9B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$89.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$71.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
13.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.13×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$158.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$89.4M
Q4 25
$258.4M
$50.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$36.3M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$62.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$57.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$15.9M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$52.3M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$52.8M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
$71.6M
Q4 25
$29.6M
Q3 25
$17.8M
Q2 25
$39.3M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$38.2M
Q4 24
$-1.2M
Q3 24
$36.7M
Q2 24
$37.3M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
13.2%
Q4 25
5.7%
Q3 25
3.6%
Q2 25
6.9%
Q1 25
38.3%
7.3%
Q4 24
-0.2%
Q3 24
7.4%
Q2 24
6.7%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
3.3%
Q4 25
0.0%
3.9%
Q3 25
0.0%
3.8%
Q2 25
0.0%
4.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
3.6%
Q4 24
3.3%
Q3 24
3.2%
Q2 24
2.8%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
LZB
LZB
Q1 26
4.13×
Q4 25
1.71×
1.73×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.99×
Q2 25
1.87×
4.15×
Q1 25
1.69×
2.01×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.53×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.00×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.34×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

LZB
LZB

Stationary Upholstery Furniture$286.2M53%
Retail Segment$251.9M47%

Related Comparisons