vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $310.0M, roughly 1.7× MediaAlpha, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 4.5%, a 23.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MediaAlpha, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (17.3% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, MediaAlpha, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (31.9% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Alpha Group Co., Ltd. is a Chinese multinational conglomerate with animation, toy, mass media asset and entertainment company headquartered created by Cai Dongqing in 1993. In 2016, it changed its name from Alpha Animation. The company has a Chinese webcomics site, U17, and also an American film company, Alpha Pictures, and has announced the creation of an animation division also based in the United States.

KIM vs MAX — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.7× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$310.0M
MAX
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MAX
MAX
+14.0% gap
MAX
17.3%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
23.3% more per $
KIM
27.9%
4.5%
MAX
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MAX
MAX
Annualised
MAX
31.9%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Revenue
$542.5M
$310.0M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$14.0M
Gross Margin
15.1%
Operating Margin
36.4%
7.2%
Net Margin
27.9%
4.5%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
17.3%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
701.8%
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
$310.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$291.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$306.5M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$251.6M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$264.3M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$300.6M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$259.1M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$178.3M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
$14.0M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$31.4M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$14.9M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$-18.7M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-1.9M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$4.6M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$9.5M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$3.6M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
15.1%
Q4 25
15.4%
Q3 25
14.2%
Q2 25
15.0%
Q1 25
15.8%
Q4 24
16.3%
Q3 24
15.1%
Q2 24
17.8%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
7.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
7.7%
Q3 25
34.9%
6.4%
Q2 25
39.2%
-8.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
0.0%
Q4 24
31.7%
6.1%
Q3 24
33.7%
6.0%
Q2 24
32.1%
3.6%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
4.5%
Q4 25
27.9%
10.8%
Q3 25
25.7%
4.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
-7.4%
Q1 25
24.8%
-0.7%
Q4 24
31.6%
1.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
3.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
2.0%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
$0.50
Q3 25
$0.26
Q2 25
$-0.33
Q1 25
$-0.04
Q4 24
$0.09
Q3 24
$0.17
Q2 24
$0.07

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$26.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$163.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$367.7M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
$26.1M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$46.9M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$38.8M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$85.4M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$63.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$43.3M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$32.3M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$28.7M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
$163.5M
Q4 25
$7.7B
$153.4M
Q3 25
$155.7M
Q2 25
$158.0M
Q1 25
$160.2M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$162.4M
Q3 24
$164.7M
Q2 24
$166.9M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
$10.4B
$4.2M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$-29.8M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$-3.8M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$7.9M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$2.4M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$-8.4M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$-24.4M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
$367.7M
Q4 25
$19.7B
$383.8M
Q3 25
$19.9B
$266.2M
Q2 25
$19.8B
$249.4M
Q1 25
$19.7B
$240.0M
Q4 24
$20.3B
$262.4M
Q3 24
$20.1B
$236.1M
Q2 24
$19.5B
$198.2M
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
36.88×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
20.23×
Q4 24
0.75×
68.31×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$-7.4M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$23.6M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$25.7M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$23.7M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$14.5M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$8.1M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$21.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-7.5M
Q3 25
$23.6M
Q2 25
$25.5M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$23.6M
Q4 24
$14.5M
Q3 24
$8.0M
Q2 24
$21.5M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
-2.6%
Q3 25
7.7%
Q2 25
10.2%
Q1 25
38.3%
8.9%
Q4 24
4.8%
Q3 24
3.1%
Q2 24
12.0%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.1%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.0%
Q4 24
0.0%
Q3 24
0.0%
Q2 24
0.1%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
MAX
MAX
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
-0.24×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.58×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
3.13×
Q3 24
2.18×
0.85×
Q2 24
2.46×
5.97×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons