vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and McGraw Hill, Inc. (MH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $434.2M, roughly 1.3× McGraw Hill, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -4.7%, a 34.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -35.1%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

McGraw Hill, Inc. is an American education science company that provides educational content, software, and services for students and educators across various levels—from K-12 to higher education and professional settings. They produce textbooks, digital learning tools, and adaptive technology to enhance learning experiences and outcomes. It is one of the "big three" educational publishers along with Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and Pearson Education. McGraw Hill also publishes reference and tra...

KIM vs MH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.3× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$434.2M
MH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+39.1% gap
KIM
4.0%
-35.1%
MH
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
34.5% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-4.7%
MH

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Revenue
$558.0M
$434.2M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$-20.2M
Gross Margin
85.3%
Operating Margin
37.2%
7.0%
Net Margin
29.8%
-4.7%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-35.1%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-119.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$-0.11

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$434.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$669.2M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$535.7M
Q1 25
$536.6M
Q4 24
$525.4M
Q3 24
$507.6M
Q2 24
$500.2M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$-20.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$105.3M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$502.0K
Q1 25
$132.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
85.3%
Q3 25
79.2%
Q2 25
77.0%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
7.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
23.4%
Q2 25
39.2%
18.0%
Q1 25
33.6%
Q4 24
31.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
Q2 24
32.1%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
-4.7%
Q3 25
25.7%
15.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
0.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
Q3 24
26.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-0.11
Q3 25
$0.57
Q2 25
$0.00
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$514.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$2.6B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$775.3M
Total Assets
$19.6B
$5.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
3.36×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$514.4M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$463.2M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$247.3M
Q1 25
$131.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$2.6B
Q3 25
$2.8B
Q2 25
$3.2B
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$775.3M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$794.6M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$283.3M
Q1 25
$10.6B
Q4 24
$10.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
Q2 24
$10.6B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$6.0B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$5.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
Q3 24
$20.1B
Q2 24
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
3.36×
Q3 25
3.52×
Q2 25
11.17×
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$309.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$285.4M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
65.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$309.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$265.0M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$-96.7M
Q1 25
$223.8M
Q4 24
$239.5M
Q3 24
$295.9M
Q2 24
$294.1M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$285.4M
Q3 25
$243.8M
Q2 25
$-112.9M
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
65.7%
Q3 25
36.4%
Q2 25
-21.1%
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
5.4%
Q3 25
0.0%
3.2%
Q2 25
0.0%
3.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
MH
MH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
2.52×
Q2 25
1.87×
-192.53×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

MH
MH

Higher Education$225.4M52%
Digital$103.5M24%
Other$44.4M10%
Global Professional$36.2M8%
Print$24.7M6%

Related Comparisons