vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $271.6M, roughly 2.1× MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 18.0%, a 11.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.5% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.4% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

MACOM Technology Solutions, Inc. is an American developer and producer of radio, microwave, and millimeter wave semiconductor devices and components. The company is headquartered in Lowell, Massachusetts, and in 2005 was Lowell's largest private employer. MACOM is certified to the ISO 9001 international quality standard and ISO 14001 environmental standard. The company has design centers and sales offices in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.

KIM vs MTSI — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
2.1× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$271.6M
MTSI
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MTSI
MTSI
+20.5% gap
MTSI
24.5%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
11.9% more per $
KIM
29.8%
18.0%
MTSI
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MTSI
MTSI
Annualised
MTSI
22.4%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Revenue
$558.0M
$271.6M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$48.8M
Gross Margin
55.9%
Operating Margin
37.2%
15.9%
Net Margin
29.8%
18.0%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
24.5%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
129.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.64

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$558.0M
$271.6M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$261.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$252.1M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$235.9M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$218.1M
Q4 24
$525.4M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$200.7M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$190.5M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$166.3M
$48.8M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$45.1M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$36.5M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$31.7M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-167.5M
Q4 24
$166.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$29.4M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$19.9M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
55.9%
Q4 25
54.5%
Q3 25
55.3%
Q2 25
55.2%
Q1 25
53.7%
Q4 24
Q3 24
54.7%
Q2 24
53.2%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
37.2%
15.9%
Q4 25
36.4%
15.2%
Q3 25
34.9%
14.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
14.8%
Q1 25
33.6%
8.0%
Q4 24
31.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
13.7%
Q2 24
32.1%
10.4%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
29.8%
18.0%
Q4 25
27.9%
17.3%
Q3 25
25.7%
14.5%
Q2 25
31.0%
13.4%
Q1 25
24.8%
-76.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
Q3 24
26.8%
14.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
10.5%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$0.46
$0.64
Q4 25
$0.67
Q3 25
$0.48
Q2 25
$0.42
Q1 25
$-2.30
Q4 24
Q3 24
$0.40
Q2 24
$0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$768.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.4B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$768.5M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$786.0M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$735.2M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$681.5M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$656.5M
Q4 24
$688.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$581.9M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$521.5M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$10.4B
$1.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.2B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.2B
Q4 24
$10.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$19.6B
$2.1B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.0B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$20.3B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$1.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$42.9M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$30.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.88×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$161.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$42.9M
Q4 25
$258.4M
$69.6M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$60.4M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$38.7M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$66.7M
Q4 24
$239.5M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$62.3M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$49.0M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
$30.0M
Q4 25
$49.4M
Q3 25
$51.6M
Q2 25
$30.5M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$61.3M
Q4 24
Q3 24
$57.1M
Q2 24
$41.5M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
11.0%
Q4 25
18.9%
Q3 25
20.5%
Q2 25
12.9%
Q1 25
38.3%
28.1%
Q4 24
Q3 24
28.5%
Q2 24
21.8%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
4.8%
Q4 25
0.0%
7.7%
Q3 25
0.0%
3.5%
Q2 25
0.0%
3.5%
Q1 25
3.4%
2.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
2.6%
Q2 24
3.9%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
MTSI
MTSI
Q1 26
0.88×
Q4 25
1.71×
1.54×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.65×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.22×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.12×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

MTSI
MTSI

Industrial Defense$117.7M43%
Data Center$85.8M32%
Telecom$68.1M25%

Related Comparisons