vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and MANITOWOC CO INC (MTW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

MANITOWOC CO INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($677.1M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.2× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 1.0%, a 26.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, MANITOWOC CO INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.6% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, MANITOWOC CO INC's revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

The Manitowoc Company, Inc. is an American manufacturer which produces cranes and previously produced commercial refrigeration and marine equipment. It was founded in 1902 and, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, designs, manufactures, markets, and supports mobile telescopic cranes, tower cranes, lattice-boom crawler cranes, and boom trucks under the Grove, Manitowoc, National Crane, Potain, Shuttlelift and Manitowoc Crane Care brand names.

KIM vs MTW — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
MTW
MTW
1.2× larger
MTW
$677.1M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
MTW
MTW
+10.4% gap
MTW
13.6%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
26.8% more per $
KIM
27.9%
1.0%
MTW
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
MTW
MTW
Annualised
MTW
16.9%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Revenue
$542.5M
$677.1M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$7.0M
Gross Margin
16.7%
Operating Margin
36.4%
3.0%
Net Margin
27.9%
1.0%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
13.6%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
-87.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.20

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$542.5M
$677.1M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$553.4M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$539.5M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$470.9M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$596.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$524.8M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$562.1M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$495.1M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$151.2M
$7.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$5.0M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$1.5M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-6.3M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$56.7M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-7.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$1.6M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$4.5M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
16.7%
Q3 25
18.5%
Q2 25
18.4%
Q1 25
19.1%
Q4 24
16.0%
Q3 24
16.7%
Q2 24
17.7%
Q1 24
18.7%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
36.4%
3.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
3.3%
Q2 25
39.2%
1.8%
Q1 25
33.6%
1.1%
Q4 24
31.7%
2.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
1.4%
Q2 24
32.1%
2.3%
Q1 24
25.9%
3.1%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
27.9%
1.0%
Q3 25
25.7%
0.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
0.3%
Q1 25
24.8%
-1.3%
Q4 24
31.6%
9.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
-1.3%
Q2 24
23.9%
0.3%
Q1 24
-2.2%
0.9%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$0.20
Q3 25
$0.14
Q2 25
$0.04
Q1 25
$-0.18
Q4 24
$1.60
Q3 24
$-0.20
Q2 24
$0.04
Q1 24
$0.12

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$77.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$447.1M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$695.2M
Total Assets
$19.7B
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
0.64×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$211.6M
$77.3M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$39.7M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$32.9M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$41.4M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$48.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$22.9M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$38.1M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$31.5M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$7.7B
$447.1M
Q3 25
$479.9M
Q2 25
$459.8M
Q1 25
$381.4M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$377.1M
Q3 24
$426.7M
Q2 24
$406.3M
Q1 24
$372.7M
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$10.4B
$695.2M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$682.7M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$681.3M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$651.6M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$640.1M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$607.6M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$592.3M
Q1 24
$10.6B
$596.0M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$19.7B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$1.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$1.9B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$1.8B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$1.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$1.8B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$1.7B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$1.8B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
0.74×
0.64×
Q3 25
0.70×
Q2 25
0.67×
Q1 25
0.59×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.59×
Q3 24
0.70×
Q2 24
0.69×
Q1 24
0.63×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$91.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$78.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
11.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
1.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
13.01×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-15.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$258.4M
$91.1M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$-14.1M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$-67.7M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$12.9M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$112.4M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$-43.6M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$11.0M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$-30.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
$78.3M
Q3 25
$-22.0M
Q2 25
$-73.7M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$2.1M
Q4 24
$101.1M
Q3 24
$-52.9M
Q2 24
$-1.9M
Q1 24
$-42.8M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
11.6%
Q3 25
-4.0%
Q2 25
-13.7%
Q1 25
38.3%
0.4%
Q4 24
17.0%
Q3 24
-10.1%
Q2 24
-0.3%
Q1 24
-8.6%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
0.0%
1.9%
Q3 25
0.0%
1.4%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q1 25
3.4%
2.3%
Q4 24
1.9%
Q3 24
1.8%
Q2 24
2.3%
Q1 24
2.5%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
MTW
MTW
Q4 25
1.71×
13.01×
Q3 25
2.41×
-2.82×
Q2 25
1.87×
-45.13×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
1.98×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×
6.88×
Q1 24
-6.80×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

MTW
MTW

US$344.5M51%
Europe$193.8M29%
Other Countries$138.8M20%

Related Comparisons