vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC (PATK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($924.2M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 3.1%, a 26.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PATRICK INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -0.5%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Anduril Industries, Inc. is an American defense technology company specializing in the development of advanced autonomous systems.

KIM vs PATK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
PATK
PATK
1.7× larger
PATK
$924.2M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PATK
PATK
+5.2% gap
PATK
9.2%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
26.7% more per $
KIM
29.8%
3.1%
PATK
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-0.5%
PATK

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Revenue
$558.0M
$924.2M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$29.1M
Gross Margin
23.0%
Operating Margin
37.2%
6.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
3.1%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
9.2%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
99.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.82

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$924.2M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$975.6M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$536.6M
$1.0B
Q4 24
$525.4M
$846.1M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$919.4M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$1.0B
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$29.1M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$35.3M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$32.4M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$38.2M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$14.6M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$40.9M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$47.9M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
23.0%
Q3 25
22.6%
Q2 25
23.9%
Q1 25
22.8%
Q4 24
22.1%
Q3 24
23.1%
Q2 24
22.8%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
6.2%
Q3 25
34.9%
6.8%
Q2 25
39.2%
8.3%
Q1 25
33.6%
6.5%
Q4 24
31.7%
4.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
8.1%
Q2 24
32.1%
8.3%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
3.1%
Q3 25
25.7%
3.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
3.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
3.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
1.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
4.4%
Q2 24
23.9%
4.7%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.82
Q3 25
$1.01
Q2 25
$0.96
Q1 25
$1.11
Q4 24
$-1.44
Q3 24
$1.80
Q2 24
$2.16

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$26.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.2B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$3.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$26.4M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$20.7M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$22.0M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$86.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$33.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$52.6M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$44.0M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$1.3B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$1.3B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.2B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.2B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.1B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.1B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.1B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$3.1B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.1B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.1B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.2B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$3.0B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$3.0B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
1.10×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
1.18×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$130.8M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$112.7M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
12.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.50×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$246.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$130.8M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$9.1M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$149.4M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$40.1M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$102.7M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$51.5M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$137.5M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
$112.7M
Q3 25
$-17.2M
Q2 25
$131.1M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$19.9M
Q4 24
$77.2M
Q3 24
$33.7M
Q2 24
$120.6M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
12.2%
Q3 25
-1.8%
Q2 25
12.5%
Q1 25
38.3%
2.0%
Q4 24
9.1%
Q3 24
3.7%
Q2 24
11.9%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
2.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
2.7%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.7%
Q1 25
3.4%
2.0%
Q4 24
3.0%
Q3 24
1.9%
Q2 24
1.7%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
PATK
PATK
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
4.50×
Q3 25
2.41×
0.26×
Q2 25
1.87×
4.61×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.05×
Q4 24
1.44×
7.05×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.26×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.87×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

PATK
PATK

Recreational Vehicle$276.3M30%
Distribution$222.4M24%
Marine$141.9M15%
Industrial$110.8M12%
Powersports$104.8M11%
Manufactured Housing$67.9M7%

Related Comparisons