vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $345.7M, roughly 1.6× Pebblebrook Hotel Trust). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -5.3%, a 35.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Pebblebrook Hotel Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -6.7%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Pebblebrook Hotel Trust is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, manages, and invests in upscale, luxury, and boutique hotel properties primarily across major urban and leisure destinations in the United States. Its portfolio caters to both business and leisure travelers, focusing on high-demand markets to deliver long-term value for stakeholders.

KIM vs PEB — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.6× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$345.7M
PEB
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PEB
PEB
+3.9% gap
PEB
7.9%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
35.1% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-5.3%
PEB
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-6.7%
PEB

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Revenue
$558.0M
$345.7M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$-18.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
2.3%
Net Margin
29.8%
-5.3%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
7.9%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
31.8%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$-0.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$558.0M
$345.7M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$349.0M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$398.7M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$407.5M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$320.3M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$337.6M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$404.5M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$397.1M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$166.3M
$-18.4M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$-17.9M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$-33.1M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$18.1M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-32.9M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$-50.5M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$43.7M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$30.9M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
37.2%
2.3%
Q4 25
36.4%
2.5%
Q3 25
34.9%
-2.6%
Q2 25
39.2%
12.9%
Q1 25
33.6%
-2.3%
Q4 24
31.7%
-6.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
11.6%
Q2 24
32.1%
15.4%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
29.8%
-5.3%
Q4 25
27.9%
-5.1%
Q3 25
25.7%
-8.3%
Q2 25
31.0%
4.4%
Q1 25
24.8%
-10.3%
Q4 24
31.6%
-15.0%
Q3 24
26.8%
10.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
7.8%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$0.46
$-0.26
Q4 25
$-0.22
Q3 25
$-0.37
Q2 25
$0.06
Q1 25
$-0.37
Q4 24
$-0.47
Q3 24
$0.24
Q2 24
$0.16

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$196.2M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$2.4B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$5.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$196.2M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$184.2M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$223.2M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$256.1M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$208.1M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$206.7M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$134.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$101.7M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$2.1B
Q3 25
$2.2B
Q2 25
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.2B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$2.2B
Q3 24
$2.2B
Q2 24
$2.2B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$10.4B
$2.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$2.5B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$2.6B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$2.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$2.8B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$2.7B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$19.6B
$5.3B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$5.3B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$5.6B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$5.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$5.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$5.7B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$5.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.86×
Q3 25
0.89×
Q2 25
0.85×
Q1 25
0.85×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.83×
Q3 24
0.80×
Q2 24
0.80×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$114.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
33.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$249.7M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$77.6M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$90.5M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$50.3M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$275.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$76.1M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$83.7M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
$114.5M
Q4 25
$152.3M
Q3 25
$6.8M
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
$146.3M
Q3 24
$-24.8M
Q2 24
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
33.1%
Q4 25
43.6%
Q3 25
1.7%
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
43.3%
Q3 24
-6.1%
Q2 24
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
27.9%
Q3 25
0.0%
17.7%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
38.1%
Q3 24
24.9%
Q2 24
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
PEB
PEB
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
5.01×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.74×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.70×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

PEB
PEB

Room$214.5M62%
Food and beverage$91.1M26%
Other$40.0M12%

Related Comparisons