vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($542.5M vs $531.4M, roughly 1.0× PJT Partners Inc.). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 10.0%, a 17.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PJT Partners Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PJT Partners Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.5% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.

KIM vs PJT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.0× larger
KIM
$542.5M
$531.4M
PJT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PJT
PJT
+9.7% gap
PJT
12.9%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
17.8% more per $
KIM
27.9%
10.0%
PJT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PJT
PJT
Annualised
PJT
27.5%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Revenue
$542.5M
$531.4M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$53.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
36.4%
23.1%
Net Margin
27.9%
10.0%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
12.9%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
4.0%
EPS (diluted)

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$542.5M
$531.4M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$442.3M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$401.1M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$321.9M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$470.5M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$320.3M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$358.1M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$327.1M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$151.2M
$53.4M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$39.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$32.9M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$54.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$51.3M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$22.1M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$28.3M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$32.6M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
36.4%
23.1%
Q3 25
34.9%
20.6%
Q2 25
39.2%
19.1%
Q1 25
33.6%
16.3%
Q4 24
31.7%
21.9%
Q3 24
33.7%
15.4%
Q2 24
32.1%
18.0%
Q1 24
25.9%
16.5%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
27.9%
10.0%
Q3 25
25.7%
9.0%
Q2 25
31.0%
8.2%
Q1 25
24.8%
16.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
10.9%
Q3 24
26.8%
6.9%
Q2 24
23.9%
7.9%
Q1 24
-2.2%
10.0%

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$538.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$308.2M
Total Assets
$19.7B
$1.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$211.6M
$538.9M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$400.5M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$214.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$194.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$483.9M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$148.8M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$164.2M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$215.5M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$10.4B
$308.2M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$228.6M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$167.4M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$148.8M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$187.0M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$159.1M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$133.8M
Q1 24
$10.6B
$174.6M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$19.7B
$1.8B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$1.4B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$155.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$138.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
26.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
3.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
2.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$480.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$258.4M
$155.7M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$256.1M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$190.4M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$-75.9M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$195.7M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$180.5M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$193.6M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$-38.8M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
$138.6M
Q3 25
$240.9M
Q2 25
$178.9M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-77.9M
Q4 24
$195.3M
Q3 24
$178.5M
Q2 24
$193.0M
Q1 24
$-39.2M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
26.1%
Q3 25
54.5%
Q2 25
44.6%
Q1 25
38.3%
-24.2%
Q4 24
41.5%
Q3 24
55.7%
Q2 24
53.9%
Q1 24
-12.0%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
0.0%
3.2%
Q3 25
0.0%
3.4%
Q2 25
0.0%
2.9%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.6%
Q4 24
0.1%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
0.1%
Q1 24
0.1%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
PJT
PJT
Q4 25
1.71×
2.92×
Q3 25
2.41×
6.43×
Q2 25
1.87×
5.79×
Q1 25
1.69×
-1.41×
Q4 24
1.44×
3.81×
Q3 24
2.18×
8.15×
Q2 24
2.46×
6.84×
Q1 24
-1.19×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons