vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and PLEXUS CORP (PLXS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PLEXUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $542.5M, roughly 2.1× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 4.3%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PLEXUS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.7% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, PLEXUS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs 3.8%).
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
Plex Systems, Inc. is an American software company based in Troy, Michigan. The company develops and markets the Plex Manufacturing Cloud, a software as a service (SaaS) or cloud computing ERP for manufacturing.
KIM vs PLXS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $542.5M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $151.2M | $49.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 10.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.4% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 27.9% | 4.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.2% | 18.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.0% | 27.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $542.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $535.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $525.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $525.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $507.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $500.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $41.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $163.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 36.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $211.6M | $303.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.4B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $19.7B | $3.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $248.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $211.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $226.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $688.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $789.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.4M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.7B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $258.4M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.71× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $258.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $332.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $223.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $295.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $294.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.71× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.69× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.46× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
KIM
Segment breakdown not available.
PLXS
| Asia-Pacific | $652.0M | 56% |
| Americas | $397.0M | 34% |
| Europe, Middle East and Africa | $116.0M | 10% |
