vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO (POR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($889.0M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.6× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 4.6%, a 23.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.9% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -2.2%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Portland General Electric (PGE) is a Fortune 1000, publicly traded energy company based in Portland, Oregon, that generates, transmits and distributes electricity, serving almost two-thirds of Oregon's commercial and industrial activity. PGE is regulated by the Oregon Public Utility Commission. Founded in 1888 as the Willamette Falls Electric Company, the company has been an independent company for most of its existence, though was briefly owned by the Houston-based Enron Corporation from 199...

KIM vs POR — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
POR
POR
1.6× larger
POR
$889.0M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
POR
POR
+4.6% gap
POR
7.9%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
23.3% more per $
KIM
27.9%
4.6%
POR
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
-2.2%
POR

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Revenue
$542.5M
$889.0M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$41.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
36.4%
10.7%
Net Margin
27.9%
4.6%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
7.9%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
7.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$542.5M
$889.0M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$952.0M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$807.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$928.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$824.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$929.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$758.0M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$929.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$151.2M
$41.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$103.0M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$62.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$100.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$38.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$94.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$72.0M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$109.0M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
36.4%
10.7%
Q3 25
34.9%
18.3%
Q2 25
39.2%
14.6%
Q1 25
33.6%
18.1%
Q4 24
31.7%
10.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
15.7%
Q2 24
32.1%
15.3%
Q1 24
25.9%
17.4%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
27.9%
4.6%
Q3 25
25.7%
10.8%
Q2 25
31.0%
7.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
10.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
4.6%
Q3 24
26.8%
10.1%
Q2 24
23.9%
9.5%
Q1 24
-2.2%
11.7%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$0.36
Q3 25
$0.94
Q2 25
$0.56
Q1 25
$0.91
Q4 24
$0.34
Q3 24
$0.90
Q2 24
$0.69
Q1 24
$1.08

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
$4.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$4.1B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$13.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
1.13×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
Q4 24
$688.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
Q1 24
$133.4M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$7.7B
$4.7B
Q3 25
$4.7B
Q2 25
$4.7B
Q1 25
$4.7B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$4.5B
Q3 24
$4.4B
Q2 24
$4.4B
Q1 24
$4.4B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$10.4B
$4.1B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$4.0B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$3.9B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$3.8B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$3.8B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$3.6B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$3.5B
Q1 24
$10.6B
$3.5B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$19.7B
$13.2B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$13.0B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$12.7B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$12.7B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$12.5B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$11.9B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$11.6B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$11.6B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
0.74×
1.13×
Q3 25
1.20×
Q2 25
1.23×
Q1 25
1.23×
Q4 24
0.75×
1.20×
Q3 24
1.22×
Q2 24
1.27×
Q1 24
1.28×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$148.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-142.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-16.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
32.6%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
3.61×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-71.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$258.4M
$148.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$403.0M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$336.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$231.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$170.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$244.0M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$189.0M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$175.0M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
$-142.0M
Q3 25
$100.0M
Q2 25
$99.0M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-128.0M
Q4 24
$-222.0M
Q3 24
$-9.0M
Q2 24
$-109.0M
Q1 24
$-150.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
-16.0%
Q3 25
10.5%
Q2 25
12.3%
Q1 25
38.3%
-13.8%
Q4 24
-26.9%
Q3 24
-1.0%
Q2 24
-14.4%
Q1 24
-16.1%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
0.0%
32.6%
Q3 25
0.0%
31.8%
Q2 25
0.0%
29.4%
Q1 25
3.4%
38.7%
Q4 24
47.6%
Q3 24
27.2%
Q2 24
39.3%
Q1 24
35.0%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
POR
POR
Q4 25
1.71×
3.61×
Q3 25
2.41×
3.91×
Q2 25
1.87×
5.42×
Q1 25
1.69×
2.31×
Q4 24
1.44×
4.47×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.60×
Q2 24
2.46×
2.63×
Q1 24
1.61×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

POR
POR

Other$507.0M57%
Commercial$231.0M26%
Industrial$140.0M16%
Direct Accesscustomers$11.0M1%

Related Comparisons