vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($737.8M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.4× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 10.1%, a 17.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.9% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (18.2% CAGR vs 3.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a hotel, resort, entertainment, and media company named for one of its assets: the Ryman Auditorium, a National Historic Landmark in Nashville, Tennessee. The company's legal lineage can be traced back to its time as a subsidiary of Edward Gaylord's Oklahoma Publishing Company; however, the backbone of the modern entity was formed with the company's acquisition of WSM, Inc. in 1983. This purchase resulted in the ownership of the Grand Ole Opry and associa...

KIM vs RHP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RHP
RHP
1.4× larger
RHP
$737.8M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RHP
RHP
+10.7% gap
RHP
13.9%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
17.8% more per $
KIM
27.9%
10.1%
RHP
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RHP
RHP
Annualised
RHP
18.2%
3.8%
KIM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Revenue
$542.5M
$737.8M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$74.5M
Gross Margin
41.4%
Operating Margin
36.4%
19.4%
Net Margin
27.9%
10.1%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
13.9%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
3.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.12

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$542.5M
$737.8M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$592.5M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$659.5M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$587.3M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$647.6M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$550.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$613.3M
Q1 24
$503.8M
$528.3M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$151.2M
$74.5M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$34.9M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$71.8M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$63.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$72.3M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$59.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$100.8M
Q1 24
$-11.0M
$42.8M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
41.4%
Q3 25
40.9%
Q2 25
49.7%
Q1 25
44.4%
Q4 24
40.4%
Q3 24
43.1%
Q2 24
48.4%
Q1 24
41.5%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
36.4%
19.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
15.0%
Q2 25
39.2%
21.1%
Q1 25
33.6%
19.8%
Q4 24
31.7%
18.6%
Q3 24
33.7%
19.3%
Q2 24
32.1%
27.4%
Q1 24
25.9%
18.2%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
27.9%
10.1%
Q3 25
25.7%
5.9%
Q2 25
31.0%
10.9%
Q1 25
24.8%
10.7%
Q4 24
31.6%
11.2%
Q3 24
26.8%
10.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
16.4%
Q1 24
-2.2%
8.1%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$1.12
Q3 25
$0.53
Q2 25
$1.12
Q1 25
$1.00
Q4 24
$1.12
Q3 24
$0.94
Q2 24
$1.65
Q1 24
$0.67

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$471.4M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$750.2M
Total Assets
$19.7B
$6.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$211.6M
$471.4M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$483.3M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$420.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$413.9M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$477.7M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$534.9M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$498.4M
Q1 24
$133.4M
$465.3M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$10.4B
$750.2M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$758.5M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$800.4M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$531.5M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$549.0M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$551.9M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$562.6M
Q1 24
$10.6B
$529.9M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$19.7B
$6.2B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$6.2B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$6.1B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$5.2B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$5.2B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$5.2B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$5.1B
Q1 24
$19.5B
$5.1B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$164.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$58.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
7.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
14.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
2.21×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$232.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$258.4M
$164.7M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$205.2M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$122.5M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$98.2M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$166.6M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$218.1M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$184.3M
Q1 24
$176.1M
$7.5M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
$58.5M
Q3 25
$135.4M
Q2 25
$53.0M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-14.5M
Q4 24
$76.0M
Q3 24
$85.7M
Q2 24
$78.8M
Q1 24
$-72.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
7.9%
Q3 25
22.9%
Q2 25
8.0%
Q1 25
38.3%
-2.5%
Q4 24
11.7%
Q3 24
15.6%
Q2 24
12.9%
Q1 24
-13.6%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
0.0%
14.4%
Q3 25
0.0%
11.8%
Q2 25
0.0%
10.5%
Q1 25
3.4%
19.2%
Q4 24
14.0%
Q3 24
24.1%
Q2 24
17.2%
Q1 24
15.0%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
RHP
RHP
Q4 25
1.71×
2.21×
Q3 25
2.41×
5.88×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.71×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.56×
Q4 24
1.44×
2.30×
Q3 24
2.18×
3.70×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.83×
Q1 24
0.17×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

RHP
RHP

Hotel Other$157.7M21%
Gaylord Opryland$147.4M20%
Hotel Transient Rooms$93.6M13%
Hotel Food And Beverage Outlets$92.2M12%
Gaylord Palms$88.2M12%
Jw Marriott Hill Country$53.7M7%
Entertainment Admissions And Ticketing$43.1M6%
Entertainment Food And Beverage$38.1M5%
Entertainment Retail And Other$28.3M4%
Ac Hotel$2.4M0%

Related Comparisons