vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Transocean Ltd. (RIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Transocean Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $558.0M, roughly 1.9× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 2.4%, a 27.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Transocean Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Transocean Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (16.9% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Transocean Ltd. is an American drilling company. It is the world's largest offshore drilling contractor based on revenue and is based in Steinhausen, Switzerland. The company has offices in 20 countries, including Canada, the United States, Norway, United Kingdom, India, Brazil, Singapore, Indonesia, and Malaysia.

KIM vs RIG — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RIG
RIG
1.9× larger
RIG
$1.0B
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RIG
RIG
+5.6% gap
RIG
9.6%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
27.4% more per $
KIM
29.8%
2.4%
RIG
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
RIG
RIG
Annualised
RIG
16.9%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Revenue
$558.0M
$1.0B
Net Profit
$166.3M
$25.0M
Gross Margin
42.0%
Operating Margin
37.2%
23.0%
Net Margin
29.8%
2.4%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
9.6%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
257.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.13

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$535.9M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$525.2M
$988.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$906.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$952.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$948.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$861.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$25.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$-1.9B
Q2 25
$163.0M
$-938.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-79.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$7.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-494.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-123.0M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
42.0%
Q3 25
43.2%
Q2 25
39.4%
Q1 25
31.8%
Q4 24
39.2%
Q3 24
40.6%
Q2 24
38.0%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
23.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
-163.1%
Q2 25
39.2%
-97.6%
Q1 25
33.6%
7.1%
Q4 24
31.7%
13.7%
Q3 24
33.7%
-51.2%
Q2 24
32.1%
-6.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
2.4%
Q3 25
25.7%
-187.1%
Q2 25
31.0%
-94.9%
Q1 25
24.8%
-8.7%
Q4 24
31.6%
0.7%
Q3 24
26.8%
-52.1%
Q2 24
23.9%
-14.3%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.13
Q3 25
$-2.00
Q2 25
$-1.06
Q1 25
$-0.11
Q4 24
$-0.14
Q3 24
$-0.58
Q2 24
$-0.15

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$620.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$5.2B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$8.1B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$15.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.64×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$620.0M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$833.0M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$377.0M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$263.0M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$560.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$435.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$475.0M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$5.2B
Q3 25
$4.8B
Q2 25
$5.9B
Q1 25
$5.9B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$6.2B
Q3 24
$6.5B
Q2 24
$6.8B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$8.1B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$8.1B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$9.4B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$10.2B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$10.3B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$10.2B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$10.7B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$15.6B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$16.2B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$17.8B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$19.0B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$19.4B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$19.5B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$20.3B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.64×
Q3 25
0.60×
Q2 25
0.63×
Q1 25
0.58×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.60×
Q3 24
0.64×
Q2 24
0.63×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$349.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$321.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
30.8%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
13.96×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$626.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$349.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$246.0M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$128.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$26.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$206.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$194.0M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$133.0M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
$321.0M
Q3 25
$235.0M
Q2 25
$104.0M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-34.0M
Q4 24
$177.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
Q2 24
$49.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
30.8%
Q3 25
22.9%
Q2 25
10.5%
Q1 25
38.3%
-3.8%
Q4 24
18.6%
Q3 24
14.3%
Q2 24
5.7%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
2.7%
Q3 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q2 25
0.0%
2.4%
Q1 25
3.4%
6.6%
Q4 24
3.0%
Q3 24
6.1%
Q2 24
9.8%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
RIG
RIG
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
13.96×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
29.43×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

RIG
RIG

Ultra Deepwater Floaters$433.0M42%
BR$236.0M23%
Other Geographical$211.0M20%
Harsh Environment Floaters$163.0M16%

Related Comparisons