vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC (SAFT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $319.3M, roughly 1.7× SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 6.3%, a 23.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs 4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, SAFETY INSURANCE GROUP INC's revenue compounded faster (9.1% CAGR vs 5.6%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and affiliated companies, commonly shortened to Nationwide, is a group of large U.S. insurance and financial services companies based in Columbus, Ohio. The company also operates regional headquarters in Scottsdale, Arizona and Des Moines, Iowa. Nationwide currently has approximately 24,000 employees, and is ranked No. 72 in the 2025 Fortune 500 list.

KIM vs SAFT — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.7× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$319.3M
SAFT
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SAFT
SAFT
+7.4% gap
SAFT
11.4%
4.0%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
23.5% more per $
KIM
29.8%
6.3%
SAFT
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SAFT
SAFT
Annualised
SAFT
9.1%
5.6%
KIM

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Revenue
$558.0M
$319.3M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$20.1M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
8.0%
Net Margin
29.8%
6.3%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
11.4%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
147.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$1.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$319.3M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$326.6M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$316.3M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$301.4M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$286.7M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$295.3M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$269.8M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$20.1M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$28.3M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$28.9M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$21.9M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$8.1M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$25.9M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$16.6M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
8.0%
Q3 25
34.9%
11.1%
Q2 25
39.2%
11.6%
Q1 25
33.6%
9.4%
Q4 24
31.7%
3.5%
Q3 24
33.7%
11.1%
Q2 24
32.1%
7.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
6.3%
Q3 25
25.7%
8.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
9.1%
Q1 25
24.8%
7.3%
Q4 24
31.6%
2.8%
Q3 24
26.8%
8.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
6.2%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$1.36
Q3 25
$1.91
Q2 25
$1.95
Q1 25
$1.48
Q4 24
$0.56
Q3 24
$1.73
Q2 24
$1.13

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$73.9M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$50.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$892.3M
Total Assets
$19.6B
$2.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.06×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$73.9M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$56.2M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$49.4M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$64.7M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$59.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$82.3M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$44.6M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$50.0M
Q3 25
$30.0M
Q2 25
$30.0M
Q1 25
$30.0M
Q4 24
$8.0B
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$892.3M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$899.6M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$873.3M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$850.7M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$828.5M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$851.4M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$810.2M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.5B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.4B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.2B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
0.06×
Q3 25
0.03×
Q2 25
0.03×
Q1 25
0.04×
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$194.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$192.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
60.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
9.67×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$194.5M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$85.5M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$32.3M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$3.2M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$128.7M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$73.8M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$25.6M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
$192.0M
Q3 25
Q2 25
$32.3M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$2.8M
Q4 24
$124.3M
Q3 24
$73.2M
Q2 24
$25.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
60.1%
Q3 25
Q2 25
10.2%
Q1 25
38.3%
0.9%
Q4 24
43.4%
Q3 24
24.8%
Q2 24
9.3%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
0.8%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
0.1%
Q4 24
1.5%
Q3 24
0.2%
Q2 24
0.2%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
SAFT
SAFT
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
9.67×
Q3 25
2.41×
3.02×
Q2 25
1.87×
1.12×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.14×
Q4 24
1.44×
15.83×
Q3 24
2.18×
2.85×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.54×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

SAFT
SAFT

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons