vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($940.1M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -11.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is a leading North American wholesale distributor of landscape supplies. Its offerings cover irrigation components, outdoor lighting, hardscape materials, nursery plants, landscaping tools and related accessories. It mainly serves professional landscapers, contractors, golf course operators, municipal maintenance teams, with a wide branch network across the U.S. and Canada.

KIM vs SITE — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SITE
SITE
1.7× larger
SITE
$940.1M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+3.9% gap
KIM
4.0%
0.1%
SITE
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-11.8%
SITE

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027

Metric
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Revenue
$558.0M
$940.1M
Net Profit
$166.3M
Gross Margin
33.9%
Operating Margin
37.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
0.1%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$558.0M
$940.1M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$535.9M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$525.2M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$536.6M
$939.4M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$1.0B
Q3 24
$507.6M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$500.2M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$-9.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$59.1M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$129.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-27.3M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$-21.7M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$44.4M
Q2 24
$119.7M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
33.9%
Q4 25
34.1%
Q3 25
34.7%
Q2 25
36.4%
Q1 25
33.0%
Q4 24
33.3%
Q3 24
34.0%
Q2 24
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
-0.5%
Q3 25
34.9%
6.8%
Q2 25
39.2%
12.8%
Q1 25
33.6%
-3.1%
Q4 24
31.7%
-2.5%
Q3 24
33.7%
5.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
-0.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
4.7%
Q2 25
31.0%
8.8%
Q1 25
24.8%
-2.9%
Q4 24
31.6%
-2.1%
Q3 24
26.8%
3.7%
Q2 24
23.9%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$-0.19
Q3 25
$1.31
Q2 25
$2.86
Q1 25
$-0.61
Q4 24
$-0.46
Q3 24
$0.97
Q2 24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$84.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$531.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.6B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$3.5B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.33×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$84.0M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$190.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$106.9M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$78.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$56.6M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$107.1M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$85.5M
Q2 24
$126.4M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$531.9M
Q4 25
$7.7B
$385.4M
Q3 25
$388.4M
Q2 25
$469.9M
Q1 25
$503.0M
Q4 24
$8.0B
$388.2M
Q3 24
$410.6M
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$10.4B
$1.6B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$1.7B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.7B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.6B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.6B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.6B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$10.6B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
$19.6B
$3.5B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$3.2B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.3B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$3.3B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.3B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$3.1B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$19.5B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
SITE
SITE
Q1 26
0.33×
Q4 25
0.74×
0.23×
Q3 25
0.23×
Q2 25
0.29×
Q1 25
0.32×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.25×
Q3 24
0.25×
Q2 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

SITE
SITE

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons