vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and SUBURBAN PROPANE PARTNERS LP (SPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Kimco Realty is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($558.0M vs $370.4M, roughly 1.5× SUBURBAN PROPANE PARTNERS LP). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 12.4%, a 17.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -13.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Suburban Propane Partners LP is a leading U.S. distributor of propane, natural gas, heating oil and related energy products, serving residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural customers across the country. It also provides HVAC system installation, maintenance and repair services, catering mainly to suburban and off-grid communities.

KIM vs SPH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
KIM
KIM
1.5× larger
KIM
$558.0M
$370.4M
SPH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+4.8% gap
KIM
4.0%
-0.8%
SPH
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
17.5% more per $
KIM
29.8%
12.4%
SPH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-13.8%
SPH

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Revenue
$558.0M
$370.4M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$45.8M
Gross Margin
64.7%
Operating Margin
37.2%
18.3%
Net Margin
29.8%
12.4%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-0.8%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
135.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.69

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$370.4M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$211.4M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$260.1M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$587.7M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$373.3M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$208.6M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$254.6M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$45.8M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$-35.1M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$-14.8M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$137.1M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$19.4M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-44.6M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-17.2M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
64.7%
Q3 25
64.7%
Q2 25
61.7%
Q1 25
58.8%
Q4 24
60.6%
Q3 24
59.4%
Q2 24
62.9%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
18.3%
Q3 25
34.9%
-7.9%
Q2 25
39.2%
2.1%
Q1 25
33.6%
27.0%
Q4 24
31.7%
15.8%
Q3 24
33.7%
-10.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
3.2%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
12.4%
Q3 25
25.7%
-16.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
-5.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
23.3%
Q4 24
31.6%
5.2%
Q3 24
26.8%
-21.4%
Q2 24
23.9%
-6.8%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.69
Q3 25
$-0.55
Q2 25
$-0.23
Q1 25
$2.10
Q4 24
$0.30
Q3 24
$-0.69
Q2 24
$-0.27

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$1.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.3B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$2.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$1.3M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$405.0K
Q2 25
$226.6M
$1.3M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$3.9M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$4.4M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$3.2M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$4.9M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.2B
Q2 25
$1.2B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$1.2B
Q2 24
$1.2B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
Q3 25
$10.5B
Q2 25
$10.5B
Q1 25
$10.6B
Q4 24
$10.7B
Q3 24
$10.5B
Q2 24
$10.6B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$2.4B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$2.3B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$2.4B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$2.4B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$2.3B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$2.3B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-47.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-67.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-18.2%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
-1.04×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$61.9M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$-47.7M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$41.8M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$95.5M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$40.1M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$8.8M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$36.8M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$61.4M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$-67.5M
Q3 25
$27.7M
Q2 25
$80.9M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$20.8M
Q4 24
$-15.1M
Q3 24
$17.7M
Q2 24
$46.8M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
-18.2%
Q3 25
13.1%
Q2 25
31.1%
Q1 25
38.3%
3.5%
Q4 24
-4.0%
Q3 24
8.5%
Q2 24
18.4%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
5.3%
Q3 25
0.0%
6.7%
Q2 25
0.0%
5.6%
Q1 25
3.4%
3.3%
Q4 24
6.4%
Q3 24
9.1%
Q2 24
5.8%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
SPH
SPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
-1.04×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
0.29×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.45×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

SPH
SPH

Propane$326.4M88%
Other Sales Revenue Net$19.9M5%
Fuel Oil And Refined Fuels$18.2M5%
Natural Gas And Electricity$5.9M2%
Wholesale$4.1M1%

Related Comparisons