vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($840.3M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.5× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -31.6%, a 61.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs 0.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -3.9%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

TreeHouse Foods Inc. is a multinational food processing company specializing in producing private label packaged foods headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. Created in 2005 and consisting entirely of acquisitions, in 2010 the company had sales of $2 billion and employed over 4,000 people at 20 facilities. Food Processing magazine named TreeHouse Foods their 2010 Processor of the Year, calling them "the biggest company you never heard of". In 2015, the company was the 37th-largest food and bev...

KIM vs THS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
THS
THS
1.5× larger
THS
$840.3M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+3.8% gap
KIM
4.0%
0.1%
THS
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
61.4% more per $
KIM
29.8%
-31.6%
THS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
-3.9%
THS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Revenue
$558.0M
$840.3M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$-265.8M
Gross Margin
18.8%
Operating Margin
37.2%
-30.2%
Net Margin
29.8%
-31.6%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
0.1%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-7717.6%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$-5.26

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$840.3M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$798.0M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$792.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$905.7M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$839.1M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$788.5M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$-265.8M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$-2.9M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$-31.8M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$58.7M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$-3.4M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$-16.7M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
18.8%
Q2 25
17.4%
Q1 25
14.5%
Q4 24
19.5%
Q3 24
15.6%
Q2 24
16.3%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
Q3 25
34.9%
-30.2%
Q2 25
39.2%
3.4%
Q1 25
33.6%
-0.7%
Q4 24
31.7%
8.9%
Q3 24
33.7%
3.8%
Q2 24
32.1%
-0.5%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
Q3 25
25.7%
-31.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
-0.4%
Q1 25
24.8%
-4.0%
Q4 24
31.6%
6.5%
Q3 24
26.8%
-0.4%
Q2 24
23.9%
-2.1%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
Q3 25
$-5.26
Q2 25
$-0.06
Q1 25
$-0.63
Q4 24
$1.12
Q3 24
$-0.07
Q2 24
$-0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$21.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.5B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$1.3B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$3.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
1.18×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$21.0M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$17.1M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$16.4M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$289.6M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$102.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$105.8M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
$1.5B
Q2 25
$1.5B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.4B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$1.5B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$1.5B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$1.5B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$1.6B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$1.6B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$3.8B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$4.0B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$3.9B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$4.0B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$4.0B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$3.9B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
1.18×
Q2 25
0.98×
Q1 25
0.93×
Q4 24
0.75×
0.90×
Q3 24
0.90×
Q2 24
0.90×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$38.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$38.2M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$-47.2M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$-53.5M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$296.2M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$41.4M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$-19.4M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$205.4M
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
$-42.2M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
38.3%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
-5.4%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
Q3 25
0.0%
Q2 25
0.0%
Q1 25
3.4%
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
2.9%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
THS
THS
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
Q2 25
1.87×
Q1 25
1.69×
Q4 24
1.44×
5.05×
Q3 24
2.18×
Q2 24
2.46×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

THS
THS

Retail Grocery Customers$670.6M80%
Food Away From Home And Other$85.3M10%
Co Manufacturing$84.4M10%

Related Comparisons