vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Travel & Leisure Co. (TNL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Travel & Leisure Co. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($798.0M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.5× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 9.9%, a 18.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Travel & Leisure Co. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs 3.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (3.8% CAGR vs -10.0%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Travel + Leisure Co. is an American timeshare company headquartered in Orlando, Florida. It develops, sells, and manages timeshare properties under several vacation ownership clubs, including Club Wyndham, WorldMark by Wyndham, Margaritaville Vacation Club, and Accor Vacation Club. The company provides timeshare exchange services, primarily through RCI, and travel clubs including Travel + Leisure GO.

KIM vs TNL — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TNL
TNL
1.5× larger
TNL
$798.0M
$542.5M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TNL
TNL
+2.4% gap
TNL
5.7%
3.2%
KIM
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
18.0% more per $
KIM
27.9%
9.9%
TNL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
3.8%
-10.0%
TNL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Revenue
$542.5M
$798.0M
Net Profit
$151.2M
$79.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
36.4%
19.9%
Net Margin
27.9%
9.9%
Revenue YoY
3.2%
5.7%
Net Profit YoY
-9.0%
8.2%
EPS (diluted)
$1.22

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$798.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$1.0B
Q3 25
$535.9M
$1.0B
Q2 25
$525.2M
$1.0B
Q1 25
$536.6M
$934.0M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$970.0M
Q3 24
$507.6M
$993.0M
Q2 24
$500.2M
$985.0M
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$79.0M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$-62.0M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$111.0M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$108.0M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$73.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$119.0M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$97.0M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$129.0M
Gross Margin
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
Q4 25
78.9%
Q3 25
98.8%
Q2 25
97.9%
Q1 25
97.5%
Q4 24
99.0%
Q3 24
97.3%
Q2 24
97.9%
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
19.9%
Q4 25
36.4%
-2.2%
Q3 25
34.9%
20.5%
Q2 25
39.2%
20.2%
Q1 25
33.6%
16.7%
Q4 24
31.7%
21.1%
Q3 24
33.7%
19.0%
Q2 24
32.1%
19.2%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
9.9%
Q4 25
27.9%
-6.0%
Q3 25
25.7%
10.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
10.6%
Q1 25
24.8%
7.8%
Q4 24
31.6%
12.3%
Q3 24
26.8%
9.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
13.1%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$1.22
Q4 25
$-0.92
Q3 25
$1.67
Q2 25
$1.62
Q1 25
$1.07
Q4 24
$1.70
Q3 24
$1.39
Q2 24
$1.81

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$211.6M
$254.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$7.7B
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
Total Assets
$19.7B
$6.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$254.0M
Q4 25
$211.6M
$271.0M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$240.0M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$212.0M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$188.0M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$185.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$194.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$166.0M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
$5.6B
Q3 25
$5.6B
Q2 25
$5.6B
Q1 25
$5.7B
Q4 24
$8.0B
$5.6B
Q3 24
$5.6B
Q2 24
$5.6B
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
Q4 25
$10.4B
$-981.0M
Q3 25
$10.5B
$-821.0M
Q2 25
$10.5B
$-852.0M
Q1 25
$10.6B
$-903.0M
Q4 24
$10.7B
$-881.0M
Q3 24
$10.5B
$-862.0M
Q2 24
$10.6B
$-885.0M
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$6.8B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$6.8B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$6.9B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$6.8B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$6.8B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$6.7B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$6.7B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$6.7B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$258.4M
$38.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$0
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.0%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.71×
0.48×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$423.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$38.0M
Q4 25
$258.4M
$124.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$163.0M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$232.0M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$121.0M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$98.0M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$145.0M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$174.0M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
$0
Q4 25
$92.0M
Q3 25
$136.0M
Q2 25
$195.0M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$100.0M
Q4 24
$75.0M
Q3 24
$125.0M
Q2 24
$153.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
0.0%
Q4 25
9.0%
Q3 25
13.0%
Q2 25
19.2%
Q1 25
38.3%
10.7%
Q4 24
7.7%
Q3 24
12.6%
Q2 24
15.5%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
3.1%
Q3 25
0.0%
2.6%
Q2 25
0.0%
3.6%
Q1 25
3.4%
2.2%
Q4 24
2.4%
Q3 24
2.0%
Q2 24
2.1%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
TNL
TNL
Q1 26
0.48×
Q4 25
1.71×
Q3 25
2.41×
1.47×
Q2 25
1.87×
2.15×
Q1 25
1.69×
1.66×
Q4 24
1.44×
0.82×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.49×
Q2 24
2.46×
1.35×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Segment breakdown not available.

TNL
TNL

Service and membership fees$396.0M50%
Other$289.0M36%
Consumer financing$113.0M14%

Related Comparisons