vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Kimco Realty (KIM) and Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. (TPH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($972.6M vs $558.0M, roughly 1.7× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 6.2%, a 23.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kimco Realty posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.0% vs -22.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Kimco Realty's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs 1.8%).

Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.

Tri Pointe Homes, Inc. is a home construction company headquartered in Incline Village, Nevada. It also offers financing and insurance services to homebuyers. It operates in Arizona, California, Nevada, Washington, Colorado, Texas, the District of Columbia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia. The company is the 18th largest home construction company in the United States based on the number of homes closed.

KIM vs TPH — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TPH
TPH
1.7× larger
TPH
$972.6M
$558.0M
KIM
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
KIM
KIM
+26.4% gap
KIM
4.0%
-22.4%
TPH
Higher net margin
KIM
KIM
23.6% more per $
KIM
29.8%
6.2%
TPH
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
KIM
KIM
Annualised
KIM
5.6%
1.8%
TPH

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Revenue
$558.0M
$972.6M
Net Profit
$166.3M
$60.2M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
37.2%
8.1%
Net Margin
29.8%
6.2%
Revenue YoY
4.0%
-22.4%
Net Profit YoY
23.7%
-53.4%
EPS (diluted)
$0.46
$0.70

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
$558.0M
Q4 25
$542.5M
$972.6M
Q3 25
$535.9M
$854.7M
Q2 25
$525.2M
$902.4M
Q1 25
$536.6M
$740.9M
Q4 24
$525.4M
$1.3B
Q3 24
$507.6M
$1.1B
Q2 24
$500.2M
$1.2B
Net Profit
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
$166.3M
Q4 25
$151.2M
$60.2M
Q3 25
$137.8M
$56.1M
Q2 25
$163.0M
$60.7M
Q1 25
$132.8M
$64.0M
Q4 24
$166.0M
$129.2M
Q3 24
$136.0M
$111.8M
Q2 24
$119.7M
$118.0M
Operating Margin
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
37.2%
Q4 25
36.4%
8.1%
Q3 25
34.9%
8.1%
Q2 25
39.2%
8.5%
Q1 25
33.6%
10.4%
Q4 24
31.7%
13.4%
Q3 24
33.7%
12.6%
Q2 24
32.1%
12.9%
Net Margin
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
29.8%
Q4 25
27.9%
6.2%
Q3 25
25.7%
6.6%
Q2 25
31.0%
6.7%
Q1 25
24.8%
8.6%
Q4 24
31.6%
10.3%
Q3 24
26.8%
9.8%
Q2 24
23.9%
10.2%
EPS (diluted)
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
$0.46
Q4 25
$0.70
Q3 25
$0.64
Q2 25
$0.68
Q1 25
$0.70
Q4 24
$1.37
Q3 24
$1.18
Q2 24
$1.25

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$982.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$10.4B
$3.3B
Total Assets
$19.6B
$5.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$211.6M
$982.8M
Q3 25
$159.3M
$792.0M
Q2 25
$226.6M
$622.6M
Q1 25
$131.3M
$812.9M
Q4 24
$688.6M
$970.0M
Q3 24
$789.0M
$676.0M
Q2 24
$126.4M
$492.9M
Total Debt
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$7.7B
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$8.0B
$646.5M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Stockholders' Equity
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
$10.4B
Q4 25
$10.4B
$3.3B
Q3 25
$10.5B
$3.3B
Q2 25
$10.5B
$3.3B
Q1 25
$10.6B
$3.3B
Q4 24
$10.7B
$3.3B
Q3 24
$10.5B
$3.2B
Q2 24
$10.6B
$3.1B
Total Assets
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
$19.6B
Q4 25
$19.7B
$5.0B
Q3 25
$19.9B
$5.0B
Q2 25
$19.8B
$4.8B
Q1 25
$19.7B
$4.8B
Q4 24
$20.3B
$4.9B
Q3 24
$20.1B
$4.8B
Q2 24
$19.5B
$4.6B
Debt / Equity
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.74×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.75×
0.19×
Q3 24
Q2 24

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$221.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$213.2M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
21.9%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
3.67×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$128.5M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$258.4M
$221.0M
Q3 25
$332.4M
$45.9M
Q2 25
$305.4M
$-74.3M
Q1 25
$223.8M
$-31.2M
Q4 24
$239.5M
$360.3M
Q3 24
$295.9M
$167.9M
Q2 24
$294.1M
$23.1M
Free Cash Flow
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
$213.2M
Q3 25
$39.1M
Q2 25
$-84.5M
Q1 25
$205.4M
$-39.3M
Q4 24
$355.9M
Q3 24
$161.5M
Q2 24
$17.0M
FCF Margin
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
21.9%
Q3 25
4.6%
Q2 25
-9.4%
Q1 25
38.3%
-5.3%
Q4 24
28.4%
Q3 24
14.1%
Q2 24
1.5%
Capex Intensity
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.0%
0.8%
Q3 25
0.0%
0.8%
Q2 25
0.0%
1.1%
Q1 25
3.4%
1.1%
Q4 24
0.3%
Q3 24
0.6%
Q2 24
0.5%
Cash Conversion
KIM
KIM
TPH
TPH
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.71×
3.67×
Q3 25
2.41×
0.82×
Q2 25
1.87×
-1.22×
Q1 25
1.69×
-0.49×
Q4 24
1.44×
2.79×
Q3 24
2.18×
1.50×
Q2 24
2.46×
0.20×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

KIM
KIM

Revenues from rental properties, net$552.8M99%
Management and other fee income$5.2M1%

TPH
TPH

West$547.8M56%
Central$245.1M25%
East$161.8M17%
Financial Services Segment$18.0M2%
Land$7.9M1%

Related Comparisons